We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Radware Cloud WAF Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has a very good interface."
"The setup of Imperva DDoS was easy."
"It fits our requirements, as well as our budget."
"Technical support was very helpful."
"Gives us the ability to trace each connection, and to have logs to be able to differentiate between a positive and a false-positive intruder action."
"Imperva DDoS is fairly stable, and its availability is quite high."
"Integration with IBM AS/400 and Db2 is okay."
"The most valuable features for us are the DDoS and Bot."
"The solution requires very little maintenance; we install it, it works without any problems, is reliable, and we can almost forget about it."
"With the current visibility dashboard, we can now obtain insight into the nature of attacks, identify attackers, and detect top IP or threat regions."
"Cloud WAF's interface is easy to use and protects us from OWASP Top Ten threats. Our dev team do QA checks on applications before they go live, but Cloud WAF creates an additional security layer on our website."
"Geo-blocking is one of the most valuable features we use the most; most of our users are in North, Central, and South America, so we use geo-blocking to block access from other countries."
"It provides the first level of defense against external threats trying to come into the environment, but it's one of the many toolkits we use."
"The solution offers good protection."
"DDoS protection is a valuable feature that works efficiently."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service is user-friendly and easy to deploy."
"Some maintenance must be performed by our IT team."
"I miss being able to integrate the dashboard with other BI tools we are using. We have to export and import data to be able to present it, and doing so is a lot of work."
"The product could use a broader scope in the area of policies."
"Imperva DDoS does not provide version control."
"It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution."
"The salespeople tend to exaggerate its capabilities, which can cost you money if you don't verify the information."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"We would like them to hire people in Sweden because it's quite hard when people are sitting in the UK or Belgium because some of the customers really want them to be local."
"Radware does not have much online training available to help customers get the most out of this solution."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service has limited integrations, and I would like to see it integrate with our use of Azure DevOps."
"The connection between the front and back ends could be improved."
"The implementation was hit or miss for the first few months. They did some tweaking and, since then, there have been no problems."
"The primary area for improvement is in issue detection and understanding whether a log is a false positive. It can sometimes be a challenge to take the data of a given security event and determine if it's a genuine threat using a Wiki etc."
"The Cloud Portal has room for improvement."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service should provide SSL certificates for its hosting customers."
"The lower-level technical team at Radware could improve their approach to problem-solving as they sometimes are very slow."
Imperva DDoS is ranked 18th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews while Radware Cloud WAF Service is ranked 11th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 17 reviews. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Radware Cloud WAF Service is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Cloud WAF Service writes "Serves as a comprehensive solution for both our current and prospective customers, generating revenue for us". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Radware Cloud WAF Service is most compared with AWS WAF, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Imperva Web Application Firewall. See our Imperva DDoS vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.