We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and MySQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"It's a good tool, a good database platform."
"However, it is easy to scale MySQL using the functions provided with the product."
"MySQL's most significant attribute is its capability to create, modify, and maintain databases. This is crucial and advantageous in procedures, such as SOAR. Therefore, all SQL functions are beneficial to any backend developer or developer who requires data storage."
"The product is flexible and easy to use."
"It is a very stable solution. I deployed the product six years ago, and it still works fine."
"I am totally satisfied with MySQL."
"The most valuable features are that it's free and the documentation is good."
"MySQL is easy and convenient for me. I don't need to rely on anyone. I can write the code and extract the information. It is fast if you know how to use it. The solution is not expensive, and most of the developers know how to use it. It is easy to create tables. The solution is stable and has good performance. The connection with AWS gives regular updates, which is manual otherwise and a nightmare."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"The availability of tools could be improved in the MySQL open-source platform. They can provide more analytical tools. I haven't had any particularly difficult issues to troubleshoot on MySQL, but in the past, on Microsoft SQL Server, I had to troubleshoot some difficult issues, and better tools were in place to see what was going on in real-time on the server. So, that's the bit that is lacking on the MySQL open-source platform."
"I would like to see more integrations of the solution with other platforms and improve the support on different data types."
"The performance, stability, and security are areas with shortcomings in MySQL, where improvements are required."
"It could be more secure."
"MySQL lacks a feature akin to Oracle's Real Application Clusters, which ensures continuous database availability within the same data center or nearby data centers."
"Since we upgraded from 8.0.12 to 8.0.22, it has had some slowness-related issues. Some of the queries that were fast previously are quite slow now. I did some research, and I found many people complaining about it."
"The solution could improve the monitoring. At the present time, you need to use third-party monitoring solutions."
"The licensing of the solution is on the expensive side."
Earn 20 points
Infobright DB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases Tools while MySQL is ranked 4th in Relational Databases Tools with 142 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while MySQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MySQL writes "Good beginner base but it should have better support for backups". Infobright DB is most compared with LocalDB, whereas MySQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Teradata and SAP HANA. See our Infobright DB vs. MySQL report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.