We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Quality and Microsoft Data Quality Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality."We use it for various use cases, including data provisioning, data validation, continuous monitoring of data quality, and data standardization."
"I do find Informatica Data Quality is stable. It generally maintains a high level of reliability and stability, making it an asset."
"There are a couple of valuable features. One is that it is very quick on the profiling. So, you get a very fast snapshot of the type of data that you're looking at from the profiling perspective. It can highlight anomalies in the data."
"The profiling feature in Informatica Data Quality is incredibly effective for data governance."
"The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing."
"Seeing the data in the mapping itself is really nice."
"The solution is stable."
"I like the connectivity and richness of features for the technical team, the maturity of the product, and that it had a cloud version. There is Informatica Cloud, and it is part of the Informatica Cloud platform."
"This solution is particularly useful for data enrichment."
"Informatica is very expensive."
"The customer servive and support could be faster. There is a slow turnaround."
"There's certainly room for improvement. One crucial area is generating detailed reports on file statuses. Presently, this is represented visually, often as graphs or charts. Such reporting could offer comprehensive insights into the areas that demand attention and further scrutiny."
"One area that could use improvement is the speed of the web interfaces. At present, they are very slow. I think it is essential that we are original and robust on-premises."
"Exploring the possibility of incorporating AI capabilities that can suggest additional rules would significantly streamline our data analysis process following data profiling."
"It can be improved in terms of performance and execution. I'm expecting better performance. It currently has some restrictions in terms of execution. For example, if we want to run it in the command mode and execute it, there are some restrictions, and we are facing some issues with a huge volume of data. These restrictions are not there in Informatica PowerCenter because we are able to execute a huge volume of data, and there are more ways to execute it."
"The tools required to migrate existing mappings and server rules through cloud data quality are not available."
"Managing the licenses with the on-premises version was difficult."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a six out of ten, with one being very easy and ten being extremely challenging. So, there is room for improvement in the setup process."
More Microsoft Data Quality Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Data Quality is ranked 1st in Data Quality with 18 reviews while Microsoft Data Quality Services is ranked 14th in Data Quality with 1 review. Informatica Data Quality is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Data Quality Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Quality writes "Offers cloud version, good connectivity and data profiling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Data Quality Services writes " Usefulness of data enrichment features, which can help improve data quality and accuracy". Informatica Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Quality, Talend Data Quality, Trillium Quality, Oracle Data Quality and SAP Information Steward, whereas Microsoft Data Quality Services is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
