We performed a comparison between Informatica MDM and Stibo STEP MDM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It comes with lot of features and is a one-stop-shop solution for integration, data modeling, and data governance. Everything can be built under one particular umbrella. If any issues come up, then there won't be any blame game saying that it could be an integration issue or an MDM hub issue because it's wholly owned by Informatica. That's the biggest advantage of Informatica MDM over that of any other tools that are available on the market."
"Informatica MDM stands out as a tool that can give you the flexibility needed for doing channel-specific data quality or business validation."
"The solution's most valuable features are its data quality, match-merge engine, and CLAIRE AI engine, which helps with AI automation."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica MDM is hierarchy management. It's not something that's typically available and effective within ERPs."
"It is easy to create REST-based interfaces of the master data objects."
"The data quality component is very good."
"I like the number of options that are presented with Informatica, fuzzy matching, and your screen."
"The fuzzy matching capability is a great feature."
"The match engine is very good and the BPM solution is very good as well."
"It's powerful and it's stable."
"It's very user friendly, and we can do everything in one place."
"Informatica MDM can improve the data catalog and data marketplace."
"Informatica MDM has limitations with connectivity."
"The configurations could be better. It is a bit confusing because we must develop two tools when building a data model in Informatica MDM. Even though Informatica MDM is a single tool, we have our hub console plus the provisioning tool within that. Whatever data model we are building in the hub console, we have to develop it in the provisioning tool again. It is double the work to create a data model. We are also using external calls or the Java custom plans functions. This can be both positive and negative. Since MDM as a client does not support any complex validation, we have to depend on the external call or a Java call. Every time we deployed, the entire solution was impacted if something went wrong."
"The tool should provide a unified user interface to manage the data objects."
"Informatica MDM has a complex user interface, which could be improved."
"From multiple masters that are there in Informatica MDM, we can improve the financials."
"Compared to other tools in the market, Informatica MDM is costly."
"The UI is terrible and not user-friendly."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The search feature for searching internal records could be improved."
"There is scope for improvement with regard to the UI."
Informatica MDM is ranked 1st in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 45 reviews while Stibo STEP MDM is ranked 5th in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 3 reviews. Informatica MDM is rated 8.0, while Stibo STEP MDM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica MDM writes "Optimize business processes while ensuring that users see a return on their investment from the use of the product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Stibo STEP MDM writes "Easy to set up with a good match engine and helpful support services". Informatica MDM is most compared with Reltio Cloud, SAP Master Data Governance, Profisee, TIBCO EBX and Semarchy xDM, whereas Stibo STEP MDM is most compared with Reltio Cloud, Informatica PIM, SAP Master Data Governance, TIBCO EBX and Riversand MDMCenter. See our Informatica MDM vs. Stibo STEP MDM report.
See our list of best Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
