We performed a comparison between SentinelOne and Sophos Intercept X based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: SentinelOne comes out on top in this comparison due to its easy setup, high performance, attractive price, and impressive ROI.
"The product is very easy to use."
"The most valuable aspect is undoubtedly the exploration capability"
"Microsoft XDR's system of analysis and investigation is super convenient for our customers. It integrates with other Microsoft solutions like Defender for 365 to protect email traffic from malicious external web links and phishing."
"Setting up Microsoft 365 Defender is easy. It's a user-friendly solution that provides threat protection. It has good stability and scalability."
"Microsoft 365 Defender is simple to upgrade."
"I like Defender XDR's automation capabilities. XDR isn't automated by default, but you can automate it to respond. If an attack is performed anywhere within the organization, you can isolate that instance from the network. This is what I can figure out for it. When integrated with Sentinel, you can set up playbooks to automate all the alerts gathered on Sentinel from different Microsoft solutions. Sentinel has a wider range of capabilities than XDR."
"Microsoft Defender XDR is scalable."
"My clients like Defender's file integrity monitoring. They're monitoring Windows and Linux system files."
"It is stable and has a good price. I find it very good."
"The stability on offer is fine."
"The most valuable feature is the CryptoGuard in Sophos. In a case of a ransomware attack, this feature comes into action to protect us."
"Since it's cloud-managed, the solution is easy to administer, especially if the person using it is in a different geophysical location."
"It's quite simple to use and user friendly."
"The thing that I like about it is the synchronized security. You can tie endpoint protection and firewalls and a whole range of other services and products. You can get your servers taken in under this."
"Malware protection and application blocking are absolutely great. The DLP and malware features are very helpful. It is also very user-friendly, reliable, and scalable. It is easy to set up. We are also happy with its price and support."
"The most valuable feature is the supervisory side of it where we can watch the throughputs, and even the loading of the device, to see how much traffic is happening."
"It has the ability to rollback a ransomware infection instantly and with minimal disruption to the user & provides robust reporting."
"The product can scale."
"The external drive scanning is great."
"The solution's in-place upgrades have been very helpful."
"Deep Visibility is a valuable feature."
"It has good visibility features and it's straightforward."
"Our impressions of the solution's ability to ingest and correlate across our security solutions is perfect."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to drill down into individual sequences of processes."
"The price should be adjustable by region."
"The design of the user interface could use some work. Sometimes it's hard to find the exact information you need."
"The documentation on their website is somewhat outdated and doesn't show properly. I wanted to try a query in Microsoft Defender 365. When I opened the related documentation from the security blog on the Microsoft website, the figures were not showing. It was difficult to understand the article without having the figures. The figures were there in the article, but they were not getting loaded, which made the article obsolete."
"It would be helpful if the solution could scan faster when it comes to scanning attachments to emails."
"The management and automation of the cloud apps have room for improvement."
"The management features could be improved, particularly in terms of better integration with Intune, Microsoft's cloud-based management solution."
"The only issue I've had is, when it comes to deployment, the steps I must take around policy setup. That is challenging."
"At times, there may be delays in the execution of certain actions and their effects."
"The initial setup can be difficult if you don't come in with at least some knowledge about the product."
"We tried to set up Sophos Zero Trust within my Sophos central cloud. It only works with Microsoft and I use Google. I'd like to see Google added."
"It consumes a lot of resources, and something needs to be done for that."
"It should offer better security updates."
"It would be beneficial if you could expand support for Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 without charging an additional fee."
"In my opinion, there have been significant developments in the product. In my opinion, I don’t have any suggestions as of now, however I can suggest a cost deduction which will be beneficial for all the parties. It will also relieve our budget and benefit our team."
"I'm not clear on what features need improvement. Everything is mostly fine."
"There are not any solutions that are a 10 out of 10. A 10 would be perfect protection with no impact on the performance of the device. This is not the case, there is some impact on the performance of the device."
"I would appreciate it if they would consider providing a comprehensive vulnerability assessment report that goes beyond just application vulnerabilities."
"The adware and pop-up blockers have room for improvement."
"I am not a fan of the UI and feel it has room for improvement."
"It is complicated to do certain tasks."
"The documentation provided for implementation is not adequate and has caused us challenges."
"This solution would be more attractive to customers if the price were lower."
"SentinelOne's performance and the accuracy of its incident filtering could be improved."
"SentinelOne could improve by reducing the price."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
Intercept X Endpoint is ranked 4th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 101 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 177 reviews. Intercept X Endpoint is rated 8.4, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Intercept X Endpoint writes "A standard offering with good threat analysis but reduces machine performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". Intercept X Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, Fortinet FortiClient and Fortinet FortiEDR, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, ThreatLocker Protect and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Intercept X Endpoint vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors, best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, and best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.