Ivanti Neurons for RBVM vs Tenable Security Center comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ivanti Logo
365 views|271 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
14,255 views|10,885 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,581 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Jahanzeb Feroze Khan
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."

More Ivanti Neurons for RBVM Pros →

"Their overall cost of service is pretty good.""Tenable Security Center scans networks and gives reports.""The product is our second solution, and we are happy that it meets our requirements.""It is a very good and user-friendly product.""The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate.""Has a great advanced scanning feature.""The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution.""The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."

More Tenable Security Center Pros →

Cons
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."

More Ivanti Neurons for RBVM Cons →

"I think the vendor training provided for Tenable.sc could be a lower price. It's quite expensive for the training.""Tenable SC could be improved with additional connectivity to external company postures and the capability of managing and sustaining agents in the systems directly without additional platforms in the middle.""The GUI could be improved to have all concerns and priorities use the same GUI, allowing them to see all tickets, assign vulnerabilities, and assign variation failures to each member of their team.""Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes.""There's a lot of information being streamed out of the reports. What would be nice, and maybe we just haven't found it, would be more of an executive-type view. We still expect it to collect all this information, but we would like a feature that would allow us to show it to an executive or a director or someone like that and give them some type of high-level overview but not get into the nitty-gritty.""Tenable SC can improve by adding more integrations with HCI-type tools and more accurate vulnerability detection.""The solution needs to improve its support. I would like to see a bird's eye view of my network architecture. I would also like to see the continuous view feature in the tool.""The solution needs to improve the vulnerability assessment because we have experienced some challenges with accuracy."

More Tenable Security Center Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is slightly more expensive than other solutions in the same sphere."
  • "We're able to save because we don't have to employ more staff members to help wit ht he scheduling of the scans, running the reports or sending them out to the systems owners. That alone is a big ROI for us."
  • "The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything."
  • "The pricing is more than Nexpose."
  • "Costing is pretty reasonable compared to the competition."
  • "We're a Fortune 500 company... our licensing costs [are] in the seven figures."
  • "We pay around 60,000 on a yearly basis."
  • "The price can start at €10,000 ($13,000 USD) for between 500 and 1,000 assets, and the price can climb into the millions as more assets are added."
  • More Tenable Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,581 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.
    Top Answer:I rate the solution's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The tool is quite expensive.
    Top Answer:The tool's initial configuration is not so easy. The hardware requirements related to the tool need to be better because we need a lot of memory to achieve speed in the solution. If our company needs… more »
    Ranking
    32nd
    Views
    365
    Comparisons
    271
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    9.0
    1st
    Views
    14,255
    Comparisons
    10,885
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    431
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RiskSense
    Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter
    Learn More
    Overview
    Evolve your vulnerability management strategy to a risk-based approach. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM enables you to prioritize the vulnerabilities that pose the most risk to better protect against ransomware and other cyber threats.

    Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

    Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

    Sample Customers
    Care First, City of Alburquerque, Electric Company El Paso, State of Arizona, Washington Gas
    IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Insurance Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization17%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vulnerability Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
    771,581 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 32nd in Vulnerability Management while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Brinqa, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.

    See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.