We performed a comparison between JD Edwards World and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of JD Edwards World is its ease of use and unique functions."
"Collecting data in standard formats for processing in a data warehouse."
"I like that JD Edwards World is perfect for my use cases, but what I like best about it is its navigation."
"The pricing is okay. It's not overly expensive."
"The most valuable feature for me is the traceability customization, which allows me to track the movement and history of artifacts in our ecosystem."
"The solution's UI is user friendly and has good performance and good search facility."
"We've found the initial setup to be easy."
"The ease of use is consistently there."
"The solution provides good production planning."
"The accounting module's record and report process is closely integrated with almost every other process."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The system can be integrated with other SAP functionalities - such as finance, production, sales, marketing, HR, et cetera, and can also be customized to become a model that's specifically designed for my business. That's the solution's most valuable aspect."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of SAP ERP is the financial module, pre-configured packages, and plenty of features. The solution is updating and adding new features that are helpful."
"The solution provides a high level of integration."
"I like that SAP ERP is very robust and stable."
"Its end of life is already announced, so I don't expect lots of improvement coming from the product anywhere anymore."
"Update interface capabilities and data maintenance tools to modern standards."
"There is no support from Oracle here. We only have third-party support."
"I would like report creation to be easier."
"The integration technology could be stronger at this point."
"World is old, so everybody is looking to just upgrade or migrate from it."
"There are a lot of new technologies coming out and JD Edwards World could improve by having better integration with other databases. The integration with the databases and applications should be in real-time, such as with Oracle."
"I have more than 18 years of JDE experience in JDE EnterpriseOne and World versions. I think JDE is good but compared to SAP and Oracle EPS, we can see which area needs to have some improvement for JDE."
"Technical support could be better."
"SAP ERP's initial setup phase needs to be simplified."
"I'm only working on the front end with ERP's user interface, which isn't very easy for end-users. It's an old-school interface, so it's often challenging to find what you need."
"The system is over-customized."
"In previous generations, SAP was stable and the roadmap was very predictable, but currently it's very difficult."
"Sometimes the cost is not reasonable, such as in the case of budgeting."
"The reporting feature could improve in SAP ERP. It could benefit from being more flexible."
"The solution is not ready for the current e-commerce environment."
JD Edwards World is ranked 16th in ERP with 12 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. JD Edwards World is rated 7.8, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards World writes "A good legacy solution that is reliable and has good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". JD Edwards World is most compared with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, Oracle E-Business Suite, SAP S/4HANA and Pronto Xi, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and Infor M3. See our JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
