We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have found the solution to be stable."
"Its stability is very reliable."
"The most valuable feature of the JIRA Portfolio is the many features it provides, such as code integration, documentation, roadmap, and Eclipse. The solution is useful for product managers."
"The most valuable feature of the JIRA Portfolio is for managing teams of 10 or more. It can track the program level and portfolio. There are plenty of beneficial features, such as the hierarchy-level view, customization, and structure plugin."
"In a PC environment, it is quite stable."
"The product's centralized database creates a single source of data for working groups so no data needs to be reconciled."
"The graphics and the resolution of the work are very good."
"The integration is very good. We've more or less integrated with everything including reporting and registering."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"The initial setup could use improvement."
"The automation in JIRA Portfolio could improve, it takes some time. We have to do some other tactics to have the same integration. Manually integrating something will take more work than if it was automated, but the automation scripting in the solution is not simple."
"Converting a task into an epic is very troublesome."
"If I get a feature but there is not a user story, and I want to know which epic it belongs to, it is really hard to figure out."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
"It would be nice if it could provide an end-to-end solution for a project."
"As there are no perfect solutions and considering that I rate JIRA Portfolio's stability an eight out of ten, I feel it is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Some key features like integration, big data warehousing and data modeling need work."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 55 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with EcoSys, Microsoft Project Server, Broadcom Clarity , LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal and Artemis Enterprise. See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.