We performed a comparison between Keysight Oscilloscopes and Tektronix Oscilloscopes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Siglent, Tektronix, Keysight Technologies and others in Oscilloscopes.
"Because they're such a big industry standard name, their products are standardized across many customers, which is why people own these products."
"The technical support is good, and it has very strong customer support. They sent an engineer to us who gave us some training and tutorials."
"The user interface is very simple. Everyone can use it."
"Its versatility and accuracy are the most valuable features."
"It's a one-stop solution. It does everything we need. The combined functionality is the biggest benefit."
"I use the serial decoder for the serial interfaces, which helps me debug my product quickly."
"The user interface is simple and straightforward, so I can easily measure frequency, time, and other complex measurements."
"It has the highest bandwidth and resolution on the market."
"Tektronix is robust and reliable. It's a hammer-resistant machine, a fact which is most important on our manufacturing floor."
"It provides you the best way to view information without opening multiple applications, like a single solution."
"It takes 35 to 45 minutes to get acclimated to the solution."
"The Tektronix user interface is like an Apple iPhone, but for oscilloscopes. It is simple to use."
"The most valuable features are its ease of use, user interface, and PAM-4. The user interface is good and easy to use."
"It has digital scopes with a high bandwidth and digitized signal. It can do whatever you want with the signal. Since its user-friendly software allows you to work with the signal, which is pretty cool."
"The sensitivity of the trigger and the reliability are the most valuable features."
"Time domain measurement is very accurate compared to other devices."
"The integration between different software and hardware panels could be improved. In the software, it's not as strong as the other solutions."
"They can improve, but I don't know how."
"In terms of additional capabilities, I would like to see more touchscreen and a larger screen. That would help."
"We are using this product to support connected devices for IoT development, but we need more automation."
"There is room for improvement with some of the features of the scope. I would like them to make it a bit more simplistic... For example, if I want to look at what the total jitter is, they should make it simpler to find that, with different tabs."
"I would like to see the possibility of interacting with the software, new features for software post-processing. For example, once you're done measuring, it would be nice to be able to generate some data starting from the measurement data."
"The technical support is okay, but sometimes they are on a different page than us. If it is something wrong with the scope, they are okay. However, if something technical goes wrong, like the calibration, it is hard to get the information that we need because it is hard to share everything and explain all the measurements in real-time."
"The user interface is not that good. It's not very intuitive. It's functional, but it's not designed for ease of operation. It's designed for functionality."
"We are looking for an Intel platform with the newest chipset."
"If you are dealing with time domain measurement, I strongly recommend using a vendor other than this company."
"We would like more features for the CAN bus decoding, such as importing DDC files, which allows us to take the raw data and convert it into engineering units."
"If they could make the user interface even more intuitive that would help. If they could make it easier to read, to know where the buttons are, that's all I need."
"I would like to see more integration into machine learning because that's what we try to apply it to."
"I am not utilizing the full bandwidth of this product."
"I know you can get the Bit Masks but it's generally really expensive to get the eye diagrams and Bit Masks with it. I wish they were included or cheaper."
"On the source side, their AWGs don't have enough bandwidth. They need to increase the bandwidth of their AWGs, meaning they have to have a faster sample rate."
Keysight Oscilloscopes is ranked 3rd in Oscilloscopes while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is ranked 2nd in Oscilloscopes. Keysight Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4, while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Keysight Oscilloscopes writes "We are able to easily record and save our test setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tektronix Oscilloscopes writes "High sampling rate enables it to clearly render the envelope". Keysight Oscilloscopes is most compared with Siglent, RIGOL Oscilloscopes, Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes, Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes and Anritsu Oscilloscopes, whereas Tektronix Oscilloscopes is most compared with Siglent, Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes, Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes, RIGOL Oscilloscopes and Yokogawa Oscilloscopes.
See our list of best Oscilloscopes vendors.
We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
