We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Tanium XEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)."The central administration con dashboard is very easy to use and provides very good oversight on all that needs to be monitored."
"While Microsoft Intune boasts a wide range of features, its user-friendliness and bundled licensing cost are key considerations for me."
"A valuable feature is user enrollment, where users can enroll their devices in their organizations themselves."
"I like that we can implement conditional access."
"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."
"This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"The most valuable feature is probably mobile device management. Small businesses are coming under greater scrutiny and requirements for compliance as time goes on. We don't have to worry about a VPN because we can manage these devices, control company data, and lock users out. If needed, we can remotely wipe devices and deadman-switch them."
"It is a very stable and scalable cloud-only solution."
"The patch manager is good, and it's easy to use."
"I like being able to image over the network. That's a nice feature that it has. Patch management is pretty decent on it as well."
"The stability is great."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central has greatly improved our organization by utilizing Service Desk Plus to monitor and keep track of issues that our end users report to our Help Desk Department. We also have written in the ode of our company's software to notify Support if an end-user experience an issue and does not report it."
"The reporting tool is very good."
"What I like best about this product is that I can log on to every PC, very easily, and chat with the user via the chat feature."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The product works perfectly for patch management and software deployments."
"The solution's technical support is very responsive."
"When Microsoft Intune is used with different android devices it does not always work as it is supposed to."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"Its configuration is fairly complicated. You have to do quite a bit of discovery to be able to deploy it for a customer. You have to ask them a lot of questions. So, its initial deployment is the biggest challenge. They should make it easier to deploy with the use of Wizards or something else. During the deployment stage, there could be profiles for the customers who are particularly wanting to use certain feature sets of Intune."
"Microsoft Intune lags market leaders, such as Apperian, in its MAM capabilities."
"The reporting is subpar. That's the only issue we have with Intune. We use another solution for that purpose."
"The most important thing is reporting. They should improve their reporting. They should give a free hand to users. In SCCM, I can create my own reports. For example, in SCCM, I can create an inventory report for my PC or for all PCs, but in Intune, we don't have an option to create any report. Microsoft claims that Intune is a successor of SCCM, but SCCM is more powerful than Intune. So, they should develop Intune more and make it equivalent to SCCM. Then, their product will be great in the market."
"We only have major classifications for iOS and Android, but there are different brands that have different cycles of updates. If they can fine-tune it to make it more brand-specific, that would be even better."
"Microsoft Intune fails a lot when it comes to device compliance."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing could be a bit better."
"Computer imaging is powerful but breaks frequently. The reason for this breaking is not clear and requires heavy amounts of attention to keep operational. There is a lot of room for this tool to do more but the reliability of this process should be focused on first to ensure core competencies are being fixed before more features are added."
"The reporting analytics could improve in ManageEngine Desktop Central. However, there are some third-party add-ins or modules you can purchase to do reporting analytics."
"The support could be faster."
"Documentation could improve so we don't need to create the support requests first."
"There are occasional glitches."
"We are looking for a complete solution for patch management with central management and the cloud which ManageEngine Endpoint Central does not provide."
"There are some bugs in the product. The tool needs to improve in the area of reporting."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 3rd in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 60 reviews while Tanium XEM is ranked 13th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 1 review. ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2, while Tanium XEM is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tanium XEM writes "Offers reliability and efficiency to users". ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Tanium XEM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Adaptiva and Ivanti Neurons for MDM.
See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.