We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Log360 and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."
"The deployment is quite simple and pretty straightforward."
"The reports that you can run are really nice."
"The Sharecon feature is the most valuable."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"We haven't had any stability issues."
"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."
"The product’s interface is intuitive."
"Some of the strengths of Wazuh that stand out for us include its scalability when deployed on Azure, its open-source nature, which allows for customization based on our needs, and its compatibility with various security solutions like threat intelligence platforms."
"The configuration assessment and Pile integrity monitoring features are decent."
"The most valuable feature of Wazuh is the ELK for doing an investigation."
"Wazuh has very flexible and robust features."
"The tool is stable."
"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."
"I like that the solution is on top of the Kubernetes stack."
"We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot."
"The integration with SharePoint and Teams should be improved."
"It is not expensive compared to other solutions."
"The solution lacks some features when compared to other products."
"There is room for improvement, especially in the reporting aspect. The reports are not as good as those in Splunk."
"The support needs improvement."
"On the logging system, there's a local on-client side that is encrypted, and there's one that is not encrypted. It is only for diagnostical purposes. However, both being encrypted would be very valuable for some audits."
"The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment."
"The implementation is very complex."
"The deployment is a bit complex."
"Alerts should be specific rather than repeatedly triggered by integrating multiple factors. This issue needs improvement to create a more efficient alert system."
"They could include flexibility and customization capabilities by modifying for customers based on partner agreements."
"Log data analysis could be improved. My IT team has been looking for an alternative because they want better log data for malware detection. We are also doing more container implementation also, so we need better container security, log data analysis, auditing and compliance, malware detection, etc."
"The tool does not provide CTI to monitor darknet."
"They need to go towards integrating with more cloud applications and not just OS like Windows and Linux."
"A lack of certain features creates limitations."
ManageEngine Log360 is ranked 27th in Log Management with 15 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. ManageEngine Log360 is rated 7.2, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Log360 writes "Facilitates incident backtracking and identifying the cause of incidents but insufficient intelligence-driven analysis to suppress unnecessary alerts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". ManageEngine Log360 is most compared with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, Splunk Enterprise Security, Fortinet FortiSIEM, Microsoft Sentinel and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, AlienVault OSSIM and Graylog. See our ManageEngine Log360 vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
