We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."The solution helps us figure out vulnerabilities and fix them."
"The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"I think that this is a good solution for evaluating vulnerability in the network."
"What is useful to me is being able to fulfill very customized scanning policies. In the clinical environment, because of vendor control, we can't perform credential-vulnerability scanning. And network scans, which I've done before, can cause a lot of impact. Being able to create very customized policies to be able to routinely scan and audit our clinical networks, while simultaneously not causing impact, is important to us."
"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."
"It is a very good and user-friendly product."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"Has a great advanced scanning feature."
"Very customizable with a lot of templates."
"The user interface is the only drawback of the product."
"The product could be user-friendly, and they could enhance the web application's security features."
"The biggest issue I have with the solution is when I'm using the scanning it picks up the original DNS of that device. That means, before we image it and actually change the DNS to something within our company structure, it'll just be random numbers and letters and Tenable will stick to that DNS for a long time."
"The web application scanning area can be improved."
"It's good at creating information, it's good creating dashboards, it's good at creating reports, but if you want to take that reporting metadata and put it into another tool, that is a little bit lacking."
"The solution is expensive."
"The solution needs to improve the vulnerability assessment because we have experienced some challenges with accuracy."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
"If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic."
More ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is ranked 21st in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is rated 9.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus writes "Helps find vulnerabilities, reduces response time to critical vulnerabilities, and reduces false alerts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is most compared with Tenable Nessus and Qualys VMDR, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.