We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that Microsoft Azure File Storage works fine and is quick to deploy. It's also easy to connect to it, particularly when connecting it with my on-premise file servers."
"It was quick to synchronize back from Azure to the on-premise server."
"The profile management option is another valuable feature that allows us to manage the profiles and secure them."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The initial setup is straightforward and takes approximately twenty minutes."
"Very user-friendly and intuitive."
"What I like about Microsoft Azure File Storage is its convenience for customers, cost-effectiveness, and high availability."
"It is a good service for file storage."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"It's a scalable product."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"The interface is good."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"Maybe Microsoft can make it more economical because it is a costly affair."
"They can improve the ability to assign permissions to different groups or users."
"It’s a challenge to find the right support person."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"The integration of the site storage with SQL was not completely seamless."
"The product name keeps changing. It can be confusing when product names change frequently, especially with Microsoft. Sometimes, if you refer to a product by a certain name last year, it might have a different name six months later."
"Sometimes it takes very long to refresh the information."
"There is room for improvement in helping customers understand and integrate Azure File Storage into their operations."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Wasabi and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.