We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technical support services are excellent."
"The global review and remediation of malicious code is probably the most valuable feature."
"It is very scalable. There are approximately 2,000 endpoints and up to 200 servers in our company."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the insight it provides."
"Offers easy integration with a cloud-based infrastructure"
"The most valuable aspects are its integration capabilities with other Microsoft products like Intune, Office 365, and Azure cloud applications."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the ability to provide threat detection and protection simultaneously."
"It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use."
"The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."
"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pros →
"The price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the solution's price needs to be reduced."
"The price could be improved."
"A stable licensing model is absent"
"The tool's onboarding of users that use on-premise or hybrid environments needs to be improved."
"I would like to see more integration with other solutions. For example, integration well with Microsoft but not with other solutions."
"I would like for there to be extra confirmation that there aren't viruses. Even if the virus detection software is always running there could be hidden applications that are using the computer."
"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the pricing structure and make it more affordable."
"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."
"I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool."
"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment."
"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Cons →
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 3rd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 27 reviews while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is ranked 4th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 4 reviews. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) writes "The tool could be integrated into any environment, but it was expensive, and the deployment process was complex". Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, Cisco Threat Grid, VirusTotal and Splunk Mission Control, whereas ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is most compared with Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, ThreatQ and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. See our Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.