We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Permissions Management and SailPoint Identity Security Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, Microsoft, CrowdStrike and others in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)."Multifactor authentication is valuable."
"Deployment takes a bit of time, however, once it's done properly, everything becomes very organized and easy to use."
"It provides a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities. You don't have to do too much custom development like other solutions such as Microsoft or NetIQ. It also has a lot of out-of-the-box connectors for different sources, directories, databases, etc. Its cloud version is working very well, and its pricing is okay. Its value for money is fine for most of the customers. It is also very flexible. They have frequent new releases and patches for fixing errors and things like that."
"The access certification feature is valuable."
"The solution’s stability and performance are good."
"SailPoint has allowed us to ensure the right people have the right access and to the rights things."
"The tool is quite stable and user-friendly."
"I like IdentityIQ's granular attachment management and certification customization features."
"A feature of SailPoint IdentityIQ that I like best is that it has good integration with other platforms. My company is using ADP here in Brazil, and SailPoint IdentityIQ works very, very well with it. My company is also using the solution for governance evaluation, segregation, and other access tests. For my company, SailPoint IdentityIQ is a very important solution, especially because it's automated, and there's a huge audit and risk issue here in Brazil."
"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."
"The cost can be prohibitive for middle-tier companies."
"SailPoint IdentityIQ could be cheaper."
"The product has poor reporting and analytic capabilities. Reports are not easy to use and its analytic capabilities are limited."
"Additional details during account aggregation failures to help quick troubleshooting."
"The UI is complex."
"The cost of this solution is high. The technical assistance center could be improved. They're very good, but considering the intricacies of the solution, they can further improve."
"I would like for the next release to have a more user-friendly interface."
"If you compare Saviynt and Okta Workforce Identity versus SailPoint IdentityIQ, SailPoint IdentityIQ needs to improve its UI."
More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) with 1 review while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is ranked 1st in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) with 62 reviews. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is rated 7.0, while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management writes "Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint Identity Security Cloud writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is most compared with Microsoft Identity Manager, Saviynt, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Microsoft Entra ID Protection and Microsoft Intune, whereas SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and SAP Identity Management.
See our list of best Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.