We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Oracle SOA Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Given that it's cross-platform right now, where you can use it on Windows and Mac, that is the single most significant feature that has resulted in wider adoption of .NET."
"As we are a software company, we find that accessing resources using this technology is easier compared to the others."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"It's easy to create and integrate things."
"Microsoft Platform is the only viable solution when I wish to do something that is not supposed to be cross-platform."
"The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"The .NET Framework simplified operations dealing with the allocation and deallocation of memory spaces and the additional processing resources."
"Microsoft .NET Framework continually innovates, particularly in Visual Studio, which focuses on improving languages, debugging, and .NET functionality."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the option to design, and the development can happen at the same time."
"Valuable features include connectors and BAM."
"The integration with various products."
"What I like best about Oracle SOA Suite is Oracle support. I also like the tool features, especially the integration feature."
"The ability to stand up a highly available SOA Suite, which has full DR capabilities, in a remote center and synchronize the databases using Data Guard."
"Middleware jobs developing for EC, ERP, and shipping systems become easier."
"The solution's XSLT or XSL Transformation feature was very useful."
"In case there is something that doesn't work out of the box, you have the flexibility to customize it."
"Improvements are needed in .NET development, particularly in a backend scenario."
"The product could have a better framework for application development."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
"This solution should include Power BI so that we don't have to use any third-party tools."
"I would like more web integration."
"In my opinion, this solution can be improved by providing out-of-the-box support for different types of libraries."
"The solution is difficult to learn if someone is learning it for the first time."
"The product’s reliability needs improvement."
"SOA, OSB, SOA Cloud Service."
"One area that could be better is the human task feature. It could be improved to provide more functionality and customization options because it has limited options available."
"Other solutions might be better componets such as Salesforce."
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved."
"The web services need to be more robust."
"The technical support is good, we have premier support which costs extra."
"The Maven integration in JDeveloper is very basic and might be enhanced to allow the proper use of Maven."
"I would like to see divided containers more separately as a microservice."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and Uniface, whereas Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, WebLogic Suite, Apache Web Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix and SAP NetWeaver. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.