We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and SSIS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The setup was easy. All Microsoft products are easy to set up."
"It has the ability to be deployed into the cloud through Data Factory, and run completely as a software as a service in the cloud."
"It is easy to set up. The deployment is also very quick."
"The most valuable feature of SSIS is its ease of use. It is easier to use than other applications."
"SSIS provides you with lookup and transformation functions, and you have the flexibility to write your own custom code."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to use and it offers a flexible custom script task."
"The data reader is the most valuable feature."
"The main value of any Microsoft product is the ease of use. You can achieve more with less time. That's what's beneficial for me. With many competitors, you might need to spend more time coming up with a solution because you have to focus on taking care of the product."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The price could be improved."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"The solution could improve on integrating with other types of data sources."
"Future releases should improve the data lineage, as it currently is not good."
"In terms of its performance, it could be better. That could be something that would be easy and welcomed as an upgrade."
"SSIS should be made a little bit more intuitive and user-friendly because it needs an expert-level person to work on it."
"When I compare Talend and SSIS, Talend provides more features. With Talend, we can handle a large volume of data. Talend is usually used to treat a large volume of data, which makes it better than SSIS on the data side. Talend also has a very good Talend Management Console to schedule the jobs and do other things. It can also be easily connected to version control tools such as GitHub or SVN. The last time I used SSIS, it was connected through TSS for the Windows Console version. I am not sure it has been improved or not. If it is not improved, Microsoft should improve it. They should change the product to provide another console."
"Sometimes when we want to publish to other types of databases it's not easy to publish to those databases. For example, the Jet Database Engine. Before the SSIS supported Jet Database Engine but nowadays it doesn't support the Jet Database Engine. We connect to many databases such as Access database, SparkPros databases and the other types of databases using Jet Database Engines now and SSIS now doesn't seem to support it in our databases."
"The solution could improve by having quicker release updates."
"It's difficult to refactor SSIS. It gets cumbersome to reuse the solution."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews while SSIS is ranked 2nd in Data Integration with 69 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while SSIS is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SSIS writes "Maintaining the solution and contacting its support team is easy". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas SSIS is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Talend Open Studio, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and AWS Glue. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SSIS report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
