We performed a comparison between Portainer and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."Portainer comes with the ability to take the information of docker definition. Using it, I can visually observe how the container has been created. It allows me to create networks. I can also visually generate volumes and working stacks."
"The platform is easy to scale as it supports Windows worker node."
"OpenShift is a user-friendly container platform with a solid GUI that helps you follow what is going on and gives you an overview of all your clusters. It's more user-friendly than the Kubernetes itself. The interface helps you learn the platform and provides access to some features or specific comments."
"The software is user-friendly and straightforward to use, which is favorable to a developer."
"Openshift is a very developer-friendly product."
"It’s user-friendly."
"On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its scalability on demand, which allows for potentially lower costs, and Built-in resiliency."
"The banking transactions, inquiries, and account opening have been the most valuable."
"Portainer needs to be more intuitive."
"The support costs are too high."
"We encounter difficulties while accessing the environment and managing the cluster. This particular area needs improvement."
"The initial setup can be hard."
"My impression is that this solution is pretty expensive so I think the pricing plan could improve."
"OpenShift Container Platform is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."
"We've encountered challenges when transitioning applications between these environments."
"There should be a simplification of the overall cluster environment. It should require fewer resources. Just to run a simple Hello World app, it requires about seven servers, and that's just crazy. I understand that it is fully redundant, but it's prohibitively expensive to get something simple going."
"Another thing that bugs me is that they removed the software in NFS storage. I don't understand why because this is a common type of storage. I am having problems with that, so I wish they would put it back."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Portainer is ranked 13th in Container Management with 1 review while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 37 reviews. Portainer is rated 8.0, while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Portainer writes "A GUI solution that helps to administer a docker using a browser". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". Portainer is most compared with Rancher Labs, HashiCorp Nomad, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, VMware Tanzu Build Service and Komodor, whereas Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service and Linode.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
