We performed a comparison between OpenVPN Access Server and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The product’s adaptability is valuable."
"It is much easier to scale and troubleshoot compared to regular Windows-based VPN solutions or PPTP daemon."
"It allows us to give access to our office network in a safe and secure way to users, no matter which computing platform they use. "
"The compatibility with almost any Linux operating system, and how easy it is to write scripts and generate keys for people to use and log in. I found it easy to deploy quickly."
"The solution is reliable, easy to use, and open source. It's free at no cost."
"OpenVPN Access Server provides remote secure access."
"The initial setup phase of OpenVPN Access Server was fine, and it was easy."
"The initial setup was easy."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Working on a faster connection might be a good idea for the product's next release."
"If there was a Graphical User Interface to help streamline the configuration, I believe OpenVPN would probably venture more into the non-geek realm as it were."
"If someone's key is not working, or if we had to remove someone's permission from it, or maybe an employee left the company and we had to take their key out, that seemed a little bit more complicated than it had to be."
"I would like to see a simpler interface, so that we can make the connection between the local network using the LAN IP."
"The solution can be more compatible with different operating systems."
"They may have this already, but it would be nice to be able to get more notifications if a site drops unexpectedly."
"It is not scalable."
"The product’s connectivity is very slow. It could be faster."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
Earn 20 points
OpenVPN Access Server is ranked 1st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 45 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. OpenVPN Access Server is rated 8.4, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenVPN Access Server writes "An easy-to-use tool with which its users can access networks from home or external locations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". OpenVPN Access Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN and SonicWall Netextender, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with . See our OpenVPN Access Server vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.