We performed a comparison between Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."
"The tool is very easy to use."
"It is a stable solution, and the initial setup is straightforward."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"The drag-and-drop feature is very valuable."
"The visual program of OutSystems is one of the major advantages of this solution."
"Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"It is much easier to develop applications with the product’s IDE."
"Scalability proved to be an exceptionally beneficial feature."
"It is very stable."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
"The tool has minor bugs."
"I would like to see OutSystems improve its integration capabilities, especially with emerging technologies like AI and GPT."
"It needs improvement in the AI capability."
"The asynchronous processing and multithreading tasks for which the current resources of the platform are very generic and not built for the end-user. Any asynchronous jobs have to be constructed with an end-user dashboard to allow inspection of the status of the activities."
"When shared extensions are updated, all the applications are redeployed."
"There are not enough resources on the market."
"The tutorials for the solution should be updated."
"The installation is a bit tedious."
"OutSystems could improve by being more like GitHub. It would be more helpful for us for division management and version control for our application."
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 14th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 5 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.