We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I would recommend the solution. It's very stable and scalable, which makes it a reliable solution."
"A valuable feature is HCM."
"PeopleSoft is a good core system. They frequently update the solution and recently they have added some good enhancement features for higher education. We just switched to the new fluid interface and that is working very well for us. It is very good."
"The recruiting is most valuable. It saves time in having easy and fast applicants tracking as well as candidates' contact plus pipeline management."
"The most valuable feature of PeopleSoft is the functionality that allows the ability to find all the data about employees that are needed."
"I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI."
"Job data is a valuable feature."
"The solution's scalability is good."
"In terms of its most valuable feature, I would say the finance module."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the SAP Fiori application."
"The solution can scale well."
"Offers an excellent UI"
"A robust product with integration between all modules."
"S/4HANA falls under a single terminal. We can easily access the data, and the performance is good."
"Responsive, comprehensive and optimized solution."
"S/4HANA offers a lot of additional capability with respect to performance due to its in-built architecture for many functions including finance, production, quality, manufacturing, inventory or sales distribution and logistics."
"The solution could improve by offering PeopleSoft site licenses. Currently, Oracle is pushing for everyone to transition to the cloud, but clients are discontent with this approach. Offering new PeopleSoft site licenses would be the most beneficial for our clients."
"I would like to see it become available again in Mexico."
"Areas that need improvement are the add-ons to the fluid pages and additional features in SCM and finance, both functionally and technically."
"Response time takes very long and requires a person to be awake night and day to benefit from it."
"I would like to see better support, bug fixing, and documentation."
"I would like for the initial rollout process to be completed faster so that it can be implemented in a more efficient manner."
"There could be more adaptability of the system."
"It would be nice if it became even more declarative in its development."
"There are some problems with the support provided for the solution, so it is not quite easy. It takes some time for them to offer us support."
"The common issues being raised right now by the end users are mostly related to the usability."
"Technical support has been declining. They aren't as responsive as they used to be."
"SAP S4HANA is not suitable for all-size companies. If you have a small company there are better fit solutions for your needs."
"A virtual machine could exist to make everything available on a single deployment."
"During parallel preparation of go-live processes, SAP B1 and S4H transactional data alignment can be difficult to track."
"If I can highlight one point that could be improved, when we talk about other ERPs, like Oracle, nowadays these ERPs provide free integration with other ERPs. For example, there is an API for banks integrated into every tool and every product form requires that bank integration in order to give real time data into the ERP. But SAP is charging a lot for that particular bank integration scenario and I think it should be free because other ERPs are providing this feature built in to the ERP. People always ask us about the integration and how much it will cost to go with that solution, so people are thinking about this."
"We are always looking for a better user experience. We would like to see more consolidation in SAP S4HANA because of all the financial compliance and regulatory changes."
PeopleSoft is ranked 12th in ERP with 80 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 75 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and PeopleStrong , whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.