We performed a comparison between PractiTest and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"Tosca BI is important to make sure that our data integrity is in check and validated; to make sure our data is good. Our data is the number-one important driver for our company, so if that's not good, we have some big problems."
"The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some scenarios and then leasing that task case to other scenarios."
"This tool is very easy to use and I think that anyone can come in, having no experience with it, and within four to six months be comfortable with it."
"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."
"It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority."
"We can also create customized functions. For example, if something isn't supported in Tricentis Tosca Commander, we can create our own function to integrate it with Tosca Commander, so we can utilize it and integrate with the macros."
"I face no challenges or stability issues."
"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
"You need to spend much more time learning the tool and how to use it, compared to others."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."
"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."
"What needs to be improved in Tricentis Tosca is its centralized repository mechanism because it's not as flexible. The repository in the solution where you store the data and the script for test automation is quite an old-fashioned mechanism that could be improved."
"The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."
"There should be ease of data manipulation within automation test cases."
"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."
"With regard to areas of improvement, report customization should be easier. It would be good if Tosca could provide standard reports for at least 20 variants. At present, there are only three to four variants. The mobile engine needs to be faster and easier to use; it is a bit cumbersome. Also, the object identification in the mobile engine needs improvement. I would like to see easy-to-use customizations for reports in the next release."
Earn 20 points
PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Regression Testing Tools with 98 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.8, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Jira, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.