We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Skyhigh Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."I like that we have many scanners and channels that don't overload. It helps us scan and track easily. Also, the tagging system is good for tagging. We can still use QualysAgent task ID tools even if tags aren't made."
"The integrations for this solution are very good. I use a different product for virtual patching of vulnerabilities and Qualys integrates well with that product."
"Tech support is helpful."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"The most valuable feature is automation."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"The most valuable features are vulnerability detection and the scanning capability to enable identification of vulnerabilities across our network."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"I personally don't have any issues with the performance or the stability of the solution."
"Tokenization."
"Offers a very strong URL spam filtering feature."
"In terms of their compatibility with major cloud providers, in terms of their abilities, capabilities, and features, they exceed everyone's capabilities in the CASB market."
"The most valuable features of MVISION Cloud are the automatic reports and modification incidents."
"The feature I found most valuable is the API."
"The other products that I have evaluated do not have the scalability options that McAfee has."
"Improves creation of security alerts on web proxy logs by having a separate system interpret said logs."
"It's too early for me to say if there is any room for improvement since we're in the first couple of months of using this solution."
"The customer support is very bad."
"There's a need to upgrade or fix the potential vulnerability rate. Around 20,000 potential vulnerabilities were showing in Qualys VMDR, but none of the other tools showed them. When we checked, it wasn't the case. Support explained that even small issues were being counted as vulnerabilities, causing issues in our audit. So, the security features could be improved to identify vulnerabilities accurately."
"One of the biggest issues from the clients' perspective is that all Qualys computing is on the cloud."
"The only improvement I can think of is on the implementation side. At times it is a bit slow."
"Integration could be better. When you think about scanning, it's not used just with this product alone but with other Qualys products. If you think about the bundle, the product itself is good. But integration with other products and packages has space for improvement. They should also offer a better price for bundles."
"It would be nice to have an all-in-one solution that was automated and could handle the scanning and reports as well as the patching and updating."
"Make some minimal dashboard improvements."
"Its initial setup could be more straightforward."
"The only thing we have faced is that sometimes, randomly, the portal becomes too slow."
"User interface could be more intuitive."
"SkyHigh has the ability to place users or groups on a ‘Watchlist’; which allows you to see certain views with these Watchlists users/groups in them. This is great when you are looking at live data but if I wanted to generate a report on "only" the watchlists."
"De-tokenization."
"MVISION Cloud is not well known and there should be more information about the solution. There could be integration to local applications."
"Iron out the few bugs that I've seen."
"Skyhigh Security, as a product, is excellent, but in terms of the right services and support, those are lagging very much, for example, in Trellix. From one hundred, its score has gone down to ten, so ten out of one hundred, otherwise, it's the number one product."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while Skyhigh Security is ranked 6th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 51 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Skyhigh Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skyhigh Security writes "Good scalability, but the technical support service needs improvement". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas Skyhigh Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Netskope , Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Symantec Proxy and Zscaler CASB.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
