We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and Skybox Security Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are many integrations with things like the VMware NSX that are great, the reporting is really solid."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its dashboards."
"InsightVM's best features are the vulnerability database and remediation steps."
"It's very scalable."
"We can create our own templates."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The assessment is most valuable."
"We are very satisfied with the reports, as they provide us with the information that is required for our management."
"The most valuable feature is firewall management."
"Security review is the most important feature, because it offers a single pane of glass to analyze multiple firewalls."
"It can be integrated with a vulnerability management solution. When a client comes, apart from pitching network and firewall change management, we are recommending having vulnerability management. So, rather than just having the audit of the firewall, they can integrate it with their vulnerability management solution, which could be Rapid7, Qualys, or any other solution. This provides them the most value out of the platform. That is the way we are approaching our customer base."
"Aside from Firewall Assurance, we are using Network Assurance and Change Manager for an overview of the whole network and for documenting requests and the recertification of the ruleset."
"We are currently working on rule review and compliance. The logging features are good."
"Robust modules can be used for different parts of network security."
"I think that compliance checks and policy compliance are the product's good features."
"The port division management was the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."
"This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider."
"Within InsightVM, there is no feature to assign a ticket. If we can have more API calls, we can do that from InsightVM."
"We are a registered reseller and a trusted partner. However, for us to get any support from them I can't log a call directly with Rapid7 InsightVM. I have to work with the distributor to log the call for me."
"They should integrate the solution with multiple products."
"Rapid7 InsightVM could be easier to use for those who are using it for the first time."
"Patch management is the only missing feature I can think of. Rapid7 detects vulnerabilities, but it should also help you manage patches."
"Technical support does not respond quickly."
"There is room for improvement on its cloud side. In the next release I would like to see better reporting."
"The only place where Skybox has room for improvement, and they're working on releasing this, it's just a slow-go, is the UI. The user interface has historically been via a locally installed thick client. They are moving to a web-based console and it's slowly coming out."
"The tool does not offer options for customization."
"Skybox Security Suite's attack surface management feature needs improvement."
"The support could be improved."
"The solution was quite technical. It would be easier to manage if the solution was more specific about aspects of the solution and provided more advisory around how to use it effectively. It would help users a lot if they were more clear about everything."
"The price is costly, and I hope they can reduce the cost."
"The most recent update was not tested with all of the vendors before it was released, so some of the features are misbehaving."
"The stability is something that is questionable. I don't know whether it is because of the kind of infrastructure we have or because of the product in itself. We're running it on a virtual machine right now. Maybe once a month, or once in every 45 days, it requires a restart because the application fails to connect. So I have to restart the whole Skybox Manager itself, the Skybox server itself, and then connect to it from our Skybox Manager."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while Skybox Security Suite is ranked 19th in Vulnerability Management with 34 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while Skybox Security Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skybox Security Suite writes "Efficient in vulnerability management, stable and easy to use ". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz, whereas Skybox Security Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Salt Security. See our Rapid7 InsightVM vs. Skybox Security Suite report.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.