We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable feature for me is the risk calculation based on monthly effects."
"The main functionality of identifying item endpoints that weren't properly patched or had vulnerabilities is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The solution scales well."
"The performance is good."
"I like Rapid7's scan optimization options."
"We are very satisfied with the reports, as they provide us with the information that is required for our management."
"The solution is very user friendly and easy to manage."
"The remediation project is a pretty effective because it allows us, as clients or countries, to choose specific assets and set limitations on them for a certain period which allows us to track and follow up on those limitations. However, when it comes to real-time monitoring and live dashboards, InsightVM doesn't quite fit the bill. It's not a real-time solution and is not instant."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"It would be nice to have an additional feature that would provide reports on who has logged onto the console or who did what on the console."
"They should improve the cybersecurity feature of the solution."
"There is a significant learning curve, that non-technical individuals, especially those not specialized in computer science or the information security industry, might face."
"All products have room for increased security and Rapid7 InsightVM is no exception."
"Rapid7 InsightVM, has impressive capabilities, especially when it comes to managing video equipment. However, we've noticed that Rapid7 also offers a cloud solution called CloudSec, and we don't have that. We think it would be better if InsightVM had all the features for both on-premise and cloud management."
"The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools."
"I would say that it improved our visibility, but it left things open."
"It is still not a fully cloud-based solution. It will be helpful for customers if it is a complete cloud solution. It is a hybrid solution at the moment."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 26th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 2 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Tenable Security Center and AttackIQ.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.