We performed a comparison between RSA SecurID and SailPoint Identity Security Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."
"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."
"It is a scalable solution."
"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."
"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."
"Provides functionalities for various stages, such as joiner, mover, and leaver"
"The level of customization for data imports and role modeling, because it helps to integrate faster, support easier and let it reuse the organization role structure."
"The solution’s stability and performance are good."
"This solution has made our team more effective. We need less manual approvals when someone new joins our company. There is less paperwork and fewer support tickets raised for access."
"We like the integration with other systems."
"The compliance features are the most valuable features."
"This solution has improved our organization through its ease of application onboarding, approvals, provisioning, and lifecycle UI performance."
"We are happy with the SailPoint IdentityIQ’s stability."
"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."
"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."
"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."
"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."
"The solution, in general, is quite expensive."
"The advanced provisioning features require more improvement."
"We faced some issues while integrating the solution with a third-party tool."
"Scalability is hard, especially when you are doing it in real time."
"Needs to focus on automation wherein provisioning of work can be improved and access certification should be automated without the intervention from a manager for approval."
"They should lower the price and technical support should be better."
"The UI needs to be more user friendly. More concentration on historical policy violations would be great. In terms of new features, I would like to see artificial intelligence and machine language added."
"There is a need for further enhancements, specifically in the multifactor authentication capabilities."
More SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
RSA SecurID is ranked 8th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 62 reviews. RSA SecurID is rated 7.8, while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of RSA SecurID writes "Useful for making logins more secure by using multifactor authentication but extremely expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint Identity Security Cloud writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". RSA SecurID is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity Platform, Fortinet FortiToken and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and Microsoft Identity Manager.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.