We performed a comparison between SAP Cloud Platform and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The mapping transformation allows us to connect our on-premise ECC to the cloud system."
"The HANA replications are very useful."
"I found flexibility most valuable in the SAP Cloud Platform. It's a simple tool that's good even for first-time users."
"The solution has a lot of great features."
"It's suitable for various sizes of companies. I have used it with big companies and with small ones as well."
"Cloud Platform's stability is great."
"The features I found most valuable are the integration options."
"Improved our speed to bring our mobile applications into productive use in a cost-effective way."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"The solution is scalable."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Planning features are limited to the finance module."
"What I would like to see improved is the learning curve."
"I've observed a few bugs in SAP. One recent bug I found in Content Modifier is that when using a predefined header to call the current date, it prints the previous date. These are small bugs I found."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements with the price and the licensing."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"When they innovate too fast, they end up confusing their customers."
"We need to connect our ERP solution via the VPN. We need to make sure our ERP solutions aren't exposed to the outside world. Our teams really struggle with this."
"When I started looking at the client's IT architecture, I started by doing a study of their services, DVM, data volume, and management services. According to the results, they could be a lot better at this."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 12th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews. SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and Mendix, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our SAP Cloud Platform vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.