We performed a comparison between SECDO Platform and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"It basically automates the entire alert investigation process."
"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."
"It is a very complete platform."
"I rate Carbon Black CB Defense an eight out of ten for the ease of its initial setup."
"The triage feature that shows you the whole chain of the malware is useful."
"Carbon Black Cb Defense has a nice component called Alert Triage. It contains full details of the process execution "kill chain" and "go live" for immediate remediation."
"VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is a highly stable solution."
"The solution is stable."
"I found it very valuable as a whole. It is good at detecting anything and has kept us very safe. It is also very easy to use."
"There's lots of very useful documentation online to help troubleshoot and learn about the product."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"Detections could be improved."
"Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."
"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."
"The tech support communicates, but it's just not with movement."
"The node management could be much better. The one thing that they cannot do very easily is change the tenant from a backend."
"Right now, Carbon Black CB Defense doesn't support cloud computing and Kubernetes."
"Its compatibility can be improved. It did crash a server during deployment, which is not something that I want to happen. Its deployment should also be easier. The whole deployment cycle needs to be simplified. It is an enterprise solution, and to set it up right now, you have to be an expert."
"Based on all the security roles and the release privilege, it could take time for an application to be whitelisted and approved for use."
"I would personally give the tech support a rating of seven out of ten."
"It would be a better solution if Carbon Black Cb Defense had an on-promise solution and a virus auto delete or quarantine."
"I would like to see the user credentials feature improved. I would also like to see more reporting features and better ways to roll the reports out."
Earn 20 points
SECDO Platform is ranked 9th in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 1st in Security Incident Response with 61 reviews. SECDO Platform is rated 9.0, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". SECDO Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiSOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.