SUSE NeuVector vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SentinelOne Logo
1,149 views|496 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
SUSE Logo
3,261 views|2,322 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and SUSE NeuVector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed SUSE NeuVector vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end.""We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek.""The UI is very good.""Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features.""The mean time to detect has been reduced.""PingSafe offers comprehensive security posture management.""We've seen a reduction in resources devoted to vulnerability monitoring. Before PingSafe we spent a lot of time monitoring and fixing these issues. PingSafe enabled us to divert more resources to the production environment.""The UI is responsive and user-friendly."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pros →

"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost.""The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable.""The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward.""The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities.""The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security.""The UI has a lot of features.""When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."

More SUSE NeuVector Pros →

Cons
"PingSafe takes four to five hours to detect and highlight an issue, and that time should be reduced.""We can customize security policies but lack auditing capabilities.""Bugs need to be disclosed quickly.""There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe.""There's an array of upcoming versions with numerous features to be incorporated into the roadmap. Customers particularly appreciate the service's emphasis on intensive security, especially the secret scanning aspect. During the proof of concept (POC) phase, the system is required to gather logs from the customer's environment. This process entails obtaining specific permissions, especially in terms of gateway access. While most permissions for POC are manageable, the need for various permissions may need improvement, especially in the context of security.""We wanted it to provide us with something like Claroty Hub in AWS for lateral movement. For example, if an EC2 instance or a virtual machine is compromised in a public subnet based on a particular vulnerability, such as Log4j, we want it to not be able to reach some of our databases. This kind of feature is not supported in PingSafe.""I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations.""The integration with Oracle has room for improvement."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Cons →

"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline.""The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment.""SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful.""The image-scanning features need improvement.""The documentation needs to improve a bit.""We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines.""SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."

More SUSE NeuVector Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "As a partner, we receive a discount on the licenses."
  • "It's a fair price for what you get. We are happy with the price as it stands."
  • "I wasn't sure what to expect from the pricing, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was a little less than I thought."
  • "Singularity Cloud Workload Security's pricing is good."
  • "Singularity Cloud Workload Security's licensing and price were cheaper than the other solutions we looked at."
  • "I understand that SentinelOne is a market leader, but the bill we received was astronomical."
  • "It's not expensive. The product is in its initial growth stages and appears more competitive compared to others. It comes in different variants, and I believe the enterprise version costs around $55 per user per year. I would rate it a five, somewhere fairly moderate."
  • "The pricing is fair. It is not inexpensive, and it is also not expensive. When managing a large organization, it is going to be costly, but it meets the business needs. In terms of what is out there on the market, it is fair and comparable to what I have seen, so I do not have any complaints about the cost"
  • More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing fees are paid yearly."
  • "The solution's pricing could be better. The cost of a subscription is calculated on the basis of work."
  • "The price of SUSE NeuVector is low. There is an additional cost for support."
  • "SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution."
  • More SUSE NeuVector Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features.
    Top Answer:When I joined my organization, I saw that PingSafe was already implemented. I started to use the tool's alerting features and dashboard functionalities. Considering how much I used the product, I… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security.
    Top Answer:SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution. You have to pay for the support.
    Top Answer:SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 59 in Container Security
    Views
    1,149
    Comparisons
    496
    Reviews
    65
    Average Words per Review
    1,010
    Rating
    8.6
    19th
    out of 59 in Container Security
    Views
    3,261
    Comparisons
    2,322
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    PingSafe
    NeuVector
    Learn More
    Overview

    Singularity Cloud Security is SentinelOne’s comprehensive, cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP). It combines the best of agentless insights with AI-powered threat protection, to secure and protect your multi-cloud infrastructure, services, and containers from build time to runtime. SentinelOne’s CNAPP applies an attacker’s mindset to help security practitioners better prioritize their  remediation tasks with evidence-backed Verified Exploit Paths™. The efficient and scalable runtime protection, proven over 5 years and trusted by many of the world’s leading cloud enterprises, harnesses local, autonomous AI engines to detect and thwart runtime threats in real-time. CNAPP data and workload telemetry is recorded to SentinelOne’s unified security lake, for easy access and investigation.

    Singularity Cloud Security includes both agentless and AI-powered cloud security controls, which represent two halves of our strategy to keep public cloud and container environments safe. Radically reduce your cloud attack surface with Singularity Cloud Native Security, formerly PingSafe, with agentless insights and evidence-based prioritization; protect runtime compute and container with Singularity Cloud Workload Security, SentinelOne’s real-time CWPP, with AI-powered machine-speed blocking of threats.

    SUSE NeuVector is a full lifecycle container security solution that helps your organization secure its container infrastructures, manage Kubernetes security risks, and block threats. The NeuVector continuous container security and compliance platform simplifies data protection from pipeline to production, enforces compliance, and provides complete visibility and automated controls for protection against known and unknown threats. In addition, NeuVector is the only Kubernetes-native container security solution that offers a comprehensive risk profile of known vulnerabilities and also delivers immediate protection from all vulnerabilities.

    SUSE NeuVector Features

    SUSE NueVector has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Container incident detection and prevention
    • Network security
    • Runtime security
    • Supply chain security
    • Container firewall
    • Host and platform security
    • Cloud-native automation and integration
    • Resource monitoring
    • Visualization and reporting
    • High availability
    • Security
    • Vulnerability management
    • Compliance and auditing
    • Alerting
    • Logging and Response

    SUSE NeuVector Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing NeuVector. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Deep packet inspection (DPI): NeuVector applies DPI to identify attacks, detect sensitive data, or verify application access to further reduce the attack surface. Only network layer analysis enables security to detect and verify the allowed protocols, helping security teams enforce business policy.
    • Real-time protection: NeuVector provides inspection, segmentation, and protection of all traffic into and out of a container. This includes container to container traffic, and ingress from external sources to containers, as well as egress from containers to external applications and the internet. The solution aims to protect your applications from internal application level attacks such as DDoS and DNS.
    • Capture packets for debugging and threat investigation: WIth NeuVector, you can view summary connection data and drill down into actual packet details for each container, as they scale up and down. When a threat is detected, NeuVector is able to automatically capture and display the packet info, making it easy for you to investigate.
    • Automated security policies: The NeuVector solution allows you to automate the creation of security policies to protect application workloads in production. The solution also enables you to automate and maintain run-time security policies using Kubernetes custom resource definitions (CRDs), and gives you the option to declare an application security policy at any stage in the pipeline.
    • Compliance: NeuVector offers detection capabilities and security policy enforcement that prevent PHI and PII exposure, exceed requirements, and simplify reporting for PCI-DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, and more. The solution helps you track critical vulnerabilities and compliance violations so you can quickly identify any that require immediate patching or followup alerts. It also makes it possible for you to manage vulnerability and compliance scan results, with no required integration to external workflow tools.

    Reviews from Real Users

    A Platform Solution Architect at a tech services company says, “The solution is feature-rich, easy to set up, and has good support.”

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Figo, Clear Review, Arvato Bertelsmann, Experian, Chime
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Construction Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Media Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    SUSE NeuVector vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SUSE NeuVector vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Container Security with 67 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security, AWS GuardDuty and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Sysdig Falco, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure. See our SUSE NeuVector vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.

    See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.

    We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.