We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete Mobile and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile App Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The features I find most valuable is the automatic remapping of aliases, because it is really helpful."
"I like that it offers internal methods for supported controls. It is very easy to code the tests. Object Spy is also a good feature."
"Tricentis Tosca is well integrated with other products like Jira."
"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."
"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"This solution is very easy to learn and any non-programmer or manual tester, with little experience in automation, can pick it up quite easily."
"It's a simple tool, particularly in terms of system testing. You can also convert and automate using Tricentis Tosca with ease."
"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people."
"The model-based scriptless automation is the most valuable feature because it needs less maintenance as compared to script-based automation."
"The mapping is pretty complicated because there are a lot of controls that are the same and if you have a long name with the object mapping it is easy to get confused."
"It is very difficult to use the aliases on old software."
"ScratchBook execution needs to be improved as Tosca crashes multiple times."
"Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."
"The product is not very stable when used with cloud storage. It is very hard to load the screen, making it difficult to use the tool in cloud storage."
"It needs better integration with JIRA."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"It is quite difficult to integrate the solution with other tools."
Earn 20 points
SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is ranked 14th in Mobile App Testing Tools while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Mobile App Testing Tools with 98 reviews. SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete Mobile writes "We are facing sometimes the situation when we have some issues with our automated tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is most compared with , whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim. See our SmartBear TestComplete Mobile vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
