We compared Veracode and SonarQube across several parameters based on our user's reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Based on the user reviews, Veracode's customer service and support received mixed reviews, but most customers praised the responsiveness and knowledge of the technical support team. SonarQube's customer service and support experiences varied, with some users mentioning the need for availability and response time improvement. Veracode's pricing was considered reasonable and affordable, and SonarQube's pricing was found to be accessible. Overall, Veracode's comprehensive security testing capabilities, ease of use, and accurate vulnerability detection were highly valued by users.
"It is very good at identifying technical debt."
"The stability is good."
"The depth features I have found most valuable. You receive a quick comprehensive comparison overview regarding the current release and the last release and what type of depths dependency or duplication should be used. This is going to help you to make a more readable code and have more flexibility for the engineers to understand how things should work when they do not know."
"We use this solution for qualitative coding. We make use of the SonarLint plugin as well as the dashboard."
"It is a very good tool for analysis despite its limitations."
"I like that it has a better dashboard compared to Clockwork. It's also stable."
"Before you even compile, it can catch known vulnerability issues or patterns."
"SonarQube is admin friendly."
"The dynamic scanning tool is what I like the best. Compared to other tools that I've used for dynamic scanning, it's much faster and easier to use."
"The static analysis gives you deep insights into problems."
"The SAST and DAST modules are great."
"What I found most valuable in Veracode Static Analysis is that it categorizes security vulnerabilities."
"In pipeline scanning, there is a configuration that can be set with respect to the security level of the flaw. If there is a high or a critical issue, there's a way the build can be failed and blocked before going into production."
"The dashboards and the threat insights it provides are very good. The dashboards are intuitive and pretty straightforward, but also pretty detailed."
"Static Scanning is the most valuable feature of Veracode."
"It's good at identifying security issues. It can pinpoint issues very effectively."
"It would be a great add-on if SonarQube could update its database for vulnerabilities or plugging parts."
"I think the code security can be improved."
"From a reporting perspective, we sometimes have problems interpreting the vulnerability scan reports. For example, if it finds a possible threat, our analysts have to manually check the provided reports, and sometimes we have issues getting all the data needed to properly verify if it's accurate or not."
"There could be better integration with other products."
"Their dashboarding is very limited. They can improve their dashboards for multiple areas, such as security review, maintainability, etc. They have all this information, so they should publish all this information on the dashboard so that the users can view the summary and then analyze it further. This is something that I would like to see in the next version."
"We're in the process of figuring out how to automate the workflow for QA audit controls on it. I think that's perhaps an area that we could use some buffing. We're a Kubernetes shop, so there are some things that aren't direct fits, which we're struggling with on the component Docker side. But nothing major."
"We could use some team support, but since we are using the community version, it's not available."
"SonarQube's detail in the security could be improved. It may be helpful to have additional details, with regards to Oracle PL/SQL. For example, it's neither as built nor as thorough as Java. For now, this is the only additional feature I would like to see."
"Some features could be improved in terms of user-friendliness."
"On-premise implementation is not available."
"Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them."
"Sometimes the scans are not done quickly, but the solutions that it provides are really good. The quality is high, but the analysis is not done extremely quickly."
"It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects."
"We would like the consolidation of all the different modules. This would help, so then we would be able to see analytics and results on one screen, like a single pane of glass."
"I would like Veracode to also have the ability to fix these flaws in a future release."
"Veracode Static Analysis can improve the false positive. There are always improvements that can be done to the false positive rate. There are some things that get flagged that are not an issue. However, it is not a huge concern."
SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 110 reviews while Veracode is ranked 2nd in Application Security Tools with 194 reviews. SonarQube is rated 8.0, while Veracode is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Helps to reduce false positives and prevent vulnerable code from entering production, but does not support incremental scanning ". SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Snyk and GitHub Advanced Security, whereas Veracode is most compared with Checkmarx One, Fortify on Demand, Snyk, OWASP Zap and Fortify Static Code Analyzer. See our SonarQube vs. Veracode report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
We have used SonarQube quite a lot and this is great to check code quality, security hotspots much earlier in the SDLC and fix those. The community edition is free to use, can be used on-premises and is integrated seamlessly with Jenkins and others. The Enterprise and Developer commercial editions offer a lot more rules and functionalities.
Veracode is mostly in space of security testing and amongst the leader in this space. It's a commercial product and has no community edition, to the best of my knowledge.
Depending on your use cases, you will need both of these areas to be covered through these or other tools.
They are mainly two different products.
If your goal is to set the quality on code then SonarQube is your answer.
On the other side, if your main goal is to set high-quality standards in terms of cybersecurity (i.e. both security and compliance with regulations), then Veracode is a better match.
Feels like a false choice to me. They each are trying to do different things as other posters have suggested. What are the outcomes you are looking for?
Both products in the industry are practiced slightly for different purposes. If you are after the code then SonarQube and if you are after the security then Veracode.
Klocwork