We performed a comparison between Spring Cloud Data Flow and TIBCO BusinessWorks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Spring Cloud Data Flow are the simple programming model, integration, dependency Injection, and ability to do any injection. Additionally, auto-configuration is another important feature because we don't have to configure the database and or set up the boilerplate in the database in every project. The composability is good, we can create small workloads and compose them in any way we like."
"The most valuable feature is real-time streaming."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"There are a lot of options in Spring Cloud. It's flexible in terms of how we can use it. It's a full infrastructure."
"It is user friendly, it's not complex."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a simple development. It takes a short time to get services to work."
"The most valuable feature is the low-code platform."
"XML to JSON transformations, out-of-the-box, helps to build REST services."
"The solution is very scalable. It can handle a lot. We have encryption plus integration servers running on that platform currently."
"Good performance and reliability."
"We use the solution to develop applications."
"The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."
"Spring Cloud Data Flow could improve the user interface. We can drag and drop in the application for the configuration and settings, and deploy it right from the UI, without having to run a CI/CD pipeline. However, that does not work with Kubernetes, it only works when we are working with jars as the Spring Cloud Data Flow applications."
"On the tool's online discussion forums, you may get stuck with an issue, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Some of the features, like the monitoring tools, are not very mature and are still evolving."
"The configurations could be better. Some configurations are a little bit time-consuming in terms of trying to understand using the Spring Cloud documentation."
"The cost has room for improvement."
"The container-based image is too large and this makes auto-scaling difficult."
"Cloud fitness is lacking"
"The initial setup is not easy."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"There are multiple plugins which increase the number of product installations."
"Improve Business Studio's stability to further minimize development time."
"The cost of this product is too expensive for smaller companies or those with a small number of integrations."
Spring Cloud Data Flow is ranked 28th in Data Integration with 5 reviews while TIBCO BusinessWorks is ranked 18th in Data Integration with 23 reviews. Spring Cloud Data Flow is rated 8.0, while TIBCO BusinessWorks is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Spring Cloud Data Flow writes "Provides ease of integration with other cloud platforms ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO BusinessWorks writes "Reliable integration solution with robust communication capabilities and good scalability". Spring Cloud Data Flow is most compared with Apache Flink, Google Cloud Dataflow, Apache Spark Streaming, Azure Data Factory and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas TIBCO BusinessWorks is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Mule Anypoint Platform, Talend Open Studio, Confluent and Informatica PowerCenter. See our Spring Cloud Data Flow vs. TIBCO BusinessWorks report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.