We performed a comparison between Tricentis NeoLoad and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The most useful aspect of Tricentis NeoLoad was for the web."
"From a functional perspective, the range of tools provided with Tricentis NeoLoad is perhaps the widest."
"Simple capturing of dynamic variables and simple scripting."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."
"NeoLoad offers better reporting than most competing tools. It is effortless to analyze and measure the reported data. It's also simple to generate a report that most people can read and management can understand. NeoLoad helps you figure out the main issues inside the application."
"Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."
"NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution."
"Tricentis NeoLoad is quite easy to use as compared to JMeter."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"The solution is easy to use and they have also integrated with Microsoft."
"Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the terminal emulation mainframe. It is not able to use the low code or no code option. You have to code it yourself."
"Some users may find NeoLoad too technical, while other users may prefer a scripting language instead of a UI with figures and forms they have to fill in."
"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."
"The solution can be improved by introducing a secure testing feature."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"The debugging part of Tricentis NeoLoad takes time."
"Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing."
"It needs improvement with post-production."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"The solution can improve the startup time."
"Over the years, I haven't identified any specific enhancements that I desire; Visual Studio has consistently met my requirements seamlessly and flawlessly."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 62 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes " Maintenance will be easy, pretty straightforward to learn and flexible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and Oracle Application Testing Suite, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, SmartBear TestComplete, TestRail and Tricentis Tosca.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
