The product is the most stable technology in the market and is one of the most appropriate solutions for our company's clients as it can be used in a simple manner.
Automatic LPM is an area that is currently not available in IBM PowerVM, and it is a feature I want to see in the product's future releases. It was very expensive when I tried to use the tool's LPM functionality.
I have experience with IBM PowerVM. I am a customer and a reseller of the tool.
The product never fails while working and is very stable in general. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
It is a scalable solution if used in a small place. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Even if the product is expensive, it works well in the long term. The tool is more or less expensive, and I would presently describe it as an optimally priced product.
The product is primarily used in our company's customers' computing environment for subnetting.
The beneficial feature of the product for system scalability revolves around the area involving IBM technology and the face that the tool offers different IBM Power Servers, overlaps, and performance.
LPM in IBM PowerVM is a good technology, but it is not a solution for all problems. I use the solution every day on virtual appliances with big clients, and it is both a task and the main setting.
LPM in IBM PowerVM streamlines IT operations, as it is part of the IT department's basic operations.
Speaking about whether the product has had an impact in areas like cost efficiency and resource optimization, I would say that the solution is expensive.
For every project in my company, we use IBM PowerVM. Generally, all the projects are more easy to handle with IBM PowerVM, including the integrations with other platforms. For me, it's very easy to use the tool as it is available and very comfortable.
I have not tried to manage multiple virtual machines with the tool.
With IBM PowerVM, I have seen a lot of success.
I rate the tool an eight out of ten.