We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and ElectroNeek based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features have been the rate of recognition and the structured documents."
"Verification station is a really good feature. It allows part-owners to be able to take a look at what comes out of the tool after a document, such as an invoice, is run through ABBYY. It also allows them to update it if there are any mistakes. So, it kind of gives them a little more control over what goes through the system and lessens the errors."
"ABBYY Vantage is user-friendly...The deployment process can be done in a few minutes."
"The solution's AI technology is genius."
"Compared to other tools, ABBYY Vantage is better because it's very user-friendly."
"We like the fact that this solution is enterprise-ready, so it can be deployed on-premises, scale it, etc."
"The advantage of this tool is that it is a proven product. A lot of other products are quite new in the market."
"The initial setup is not difficult. The vendor provides technical documents to assist with deployment."
"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."
"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."
"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."
"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."
"The product's setup is straightforward."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."
"The most valuable feature is the price."
"They say that they have invoice training or document training where if you put in a certain number of documents of the same type and you fix it once, twice, or a few times, it'll automatically be able to read the same document perfectly without you having to create a layout for it to follow. That has never worked properly for any project, so I just stopped recommending it completely. We spent time trying to test and getting a bunch of invoices to test it with, and in the end, it just didn't do what it needed to. If they fix that or if they can improve on that, that would be great. It will save a lot of time for a lot of people, and it will allow people with less experience with ABBYY to be able to use it."
"Quite complex, particularly for those who are not tech savvy."
"The is a long time between application updates."
"This solution should have better integration with RPA solutions such as Blue Prism."
"Their tutorials are not enough. They can improve the tutorials and maybe add more examples in their tutorials. Currently, if you want to learn ABBYY technology, it is very difficult. There are just a few resources, such as YouTube channels and blogs. There are not many resources for learning ABBYY."
"Not a ten because sometimes some documents have handwritten data. If this improved, I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"It's important to incorporate image detection for signatures or other handwriting elements."
"Machine learning needs to be improved."
"The solution needs to improve its stability."
"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."
"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."
"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."
"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."
"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."
"Its price could definitely be lower."
"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while ElectroNeek is ranked 20th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 9 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while ElectroNeek is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ElectroNeek writes "User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, HyperScience, Microsoft Power Automate and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas ElectroNeek is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Robocorp. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. ElectroNeek report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors, best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors, and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.