Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs IBM Engineering Test Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and IBM Engineering Test Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a scalable solution.""We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it.""The program is very stable and scalable.""You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Pros →

"Latest features include versioning of testings which can be great when used for multiple releases of a product.""Reusability and integration capabilities which make it a great choice for organizations that use a variety of development tools and platforms.""It allows user to add whichever widget (predefined) based on the need. It has integration with CCM and RM to achieve traceability.""It's very reliable as a solution.""Integration with the other professional tools is a very strong advantage, so that we can have a traceability between the requirements and defects in Rational Team Concert. That's the most important aspect.""The one feature that has not allowed us to switch to any other solution is the integration with functional testing.""RQM is something that we use everyday, so it has to be up and running, otherwise we would lose everything.""The most valuable feature is the RFT because it allows us to automate manual test cases."

More IBM Engineering Test Management Pros →

Cons
"They should work on integrating the solution with AI.""Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms.""I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Cons →

"Integration capabilities with other vendors' tools should improve.""It would be helpful if we could assign a hierarchy to a group of test cases.""Mainly Quality Assurance and DevOps, but of course the whole company and management areas with more knowledge of quality and client success approach.""I think it's fine from a performance perspective but usability is something that needs improvement.""RQM could be improved by adding a feature that allows test requirements to be selected when creating a task plan.""While RQM allows for running tests and viewing results, it could be further enhanced in terms of performance and speed.""Adding support for uploading a collection of test cases would be a helpful addition.""Organizing the test cases is tedious. There is no mechanism to keep and maintain the test cases as hierarchy. This should be seriously addressed."

More IBM Engineering Test Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."
  • More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licenses of these tools (the whole CLM package) is very costly as compared to other vendors' tools."
  • "Each license includes 12 months of customer support. A free 90-day trial of the software is also available."
  • More IBM Engineering Test Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:They should improve the solution's granular reporting feature. It could be more intuitive. It doesn't serve delivery and management purpose. They should integrate the solution with AI. So that, in… more »
    Top Answer:The one feature that has not allowed us to switch to any other solution is the integration with functional testing.
    Top Answer:IBM Rational has the RFT, which is rational functional testing. We do test automation with rational functional testing. So after we do that, we can put in all the code, then I can build it, then put… more »
    Top Answer:We create test cases, and then we need to plan a new task plan feature from the existing task case file and execute the test results, which will be saved in RQM. So that is how we are using the tool… more »
    Ranking
    13th
    Views
    525
    Comparisons
    387
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    6.0
    7th
    Views
    607
    Comparisons
    307
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    383
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Rational Quality Manager, Rational Quality Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is the full, featured, enterprise ready test management solution directly in Jira. It offers full traceability across issues, requirements, test cases, and execution. The tool allows for flexibility and customisation for test plans and runs. It offers a free and flexible REST API, includes the ability to automate bulk tests, and enables seamless integration with most continuous integration tools. The in-depth reporting capability gives users the ability to analyse and share test data results between development and business teams. It’s the single source of truth to track, manage and optimise your whole test lifecycle right inside Jira software.

    Try it now https://marketplace.atlassian....

    See the overview video

    Benefits:

    • Drive reusability across Jira with cross-project hierarchical repositories for all test assets 
    • Improve collaboration with flexible workflows between traditional and Agile development teams
    • Enhance coverage with end-to-end traceability across all test artifacts
    • Eliminate duplication to increase efficiency with versioning, test data parameters and shared step features
    • Improve visibility and functionality with 70 cross-project reports and gadgets
    • Reduce management time and effort, with rich APIs for integration with test automation and DevOps tools
    • Allows teams to seamlessly collaborate and manage multiple versions of test cases in parallel while providing an audit history of changes

    Features:

    • Easy drag and drop organisation, planning and execution 
    • Hierarchical folders to manage and reuse assets across Jira projects, releases and sprints
    • Test case libraries including versioning, shared steps and test data parameters
    • Test plans and runs to manage and track test execution cycles
    • Full traceability of test cases, requirements, test execution results and defects
    • 70 cross-project reports, gadgets and Confluence Macros to track the coverage of your tests with advanced cross project reporting
    • Global and project level settings for customisation and standardisation
    • Custom fields for test cases, test steps, test plans and test runs
    • Migration function to import test cases from files or legacy test management tools
    • REST APIs for integration with test automation and DevOp tools

    Use Cases:

    • Integrate CI tools such as Jenkins, Bamboo, Travis CI or other development applications like Github, Bitbucket, Datadog via the REST API for end-to-end integration across test case management, execution, and reporting
    • Automate testing at scale, whilst maintaining traceability inside Jira. Scaled to 10,000+ tests across multiple configurations, publishing results in Jira in under 30 minutes
    • Increase efficiency by significantly reducing time spent on test case specification and management
    • Benefit from reusability across Jira projects and single points of maintenance when reusing and organizing test cases
    • Improved visibility of software testing process and quality with 70 out-of-the-box reports, including real-time dashboards
    • Clear end-to-end traceability of requirements, tests, and defects ensuring that the delivered software meets requirements.














    IBM Engineering Test Management (ETM), formerly known as IBM Rational® Quality Manager (RQM), is a business-driven software quality environment designed for collaborative and customizable test planning, workflow control, tracking, and metrics reporting. When integrated with IBM DevOps Test Embedded (Test Embedded), ETM allows users to create test environments and scripts, deploy and run tests, and view HTML reports. This integration enables the creation of ETM test environments linked to Test Embedded target deployment ports, the deployment and execution of Test Embedded tests through the ETM interface, and the mapping of ETM test scripts to Test Embedded test suites. Additionally, users can import test suites as ETM test scripts, build new ETM test cases, and view test results as HTML reports within ETM. The integration requires the Test Embedded adapter service to be running on the user's computer.

    Sample Customers
    IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear,  Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient
    Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Government43%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Transportation Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is ranked 13th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while IBM Engineering Test Management is ranked 7th in Test Management Tools with 11 reviews. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is rated 7.2, while IBM Engineering Test Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira writes "Integrates with any automation tool, but the granular reporting feature should be more intuitive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Engineering Test Management writes "Scalable and Stable solution with good integration function and support team". Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis Tosca, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer and Tricentis qTest, whereas IBM Engineering Test Management is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center, TestRail, Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.