We performed a comparison between ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless and Aruba Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN."The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The simplicity is great."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The solution is very secure."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The solution is stable."
"I believe the initial setup was straightforward."
"The fact that Aruba Wireless has a virtual controller onboard the internet access points makes it cheaper than other solutions."
"The portal has been very helpful for us."
"Aruba is outstanding, especially when it comes to the hospitality sectors."
"Aruba Wireless offers a good user experience."
"The solution is quite stable and very robust."
"The virtual controller has options for updating and remotely restarting any AP from one controller panel."
"The most valuable features of Aruba Wireless are the seamless feature and the concurrent user."
"With Aruba Wireless Controller, all our access points are connected to one controller. Through that controller, we can actually handle each access point; we can disconnect or connect that access point, and then we can tell, or see, or allow how many users are, or should be, connected through that access point."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"The price could be better."
"Support is not really up to par in quickly addressing issues."
"Having a better dashboard management system that the client can use to access and control their environment would be a nice addition to the product."
"The Help option within the GUI needs to be improved."
"Configuration for this solution could be made easier, so people could benefit from being able to configure it within a quicker amount of time."
"They need to increase the number of routers on the controller."
"Aruba’s poor performance and random upgrade issues caused too much time consuming maintenance and troubleshooting."
"Access point mounting options could be better."
"There needs to be better visibility on the day-to-day monitoring."
"They should have more support for implementing Aruba Wireless in Smart Cities and outdoor applications."
"Improvements to the GUI, such as being able to search in the Mobility Master, would be nice."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless is ranked 27th in Wireless LAN while Aruba Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless LAN with 138 reviews. ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless is rated 6.6, while Aruba Wireless is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless writes "Access points work but there are problems with support, scalability, and keeping technology current". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aruba Wireless writes "The portal for centralized management and virtual controller for APs are very valuable". ADTRAN Bluesocket Wireless is most compared with , whereas Aruba Wireless is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and Huawei Wireless.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
