We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"It is very stable."
"The visual program of OutSystems is one of the major advantages of this solution."
"It is easy to use."
"Our previous solution had other overheads such as release management, version management, code management, monitoring, etc., all of which are built-in with OutSystems."
"It is a stable solution, and the initial setup is straightforward."
"There is literally a ton of stuff it can do. It's very flexible."
"The technical support is perfect."
"The most important features of this tool are its visual modeling capabilities and drag and drop functionality. You can see what you are coding which makes it easy to understand and maintain. They have also created a big revolution in digital transformation by introducing native mobile app development under the same IDE."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"There is room for improvement in technical support."
"The latest version of the app generation tools could be more user-friendly."
"The tutorials for the solution should be updated."
"The dashboards in OutSystems could improve. There are a lot of tabs in the service center that can be confusing."
"The prices should be lower. It is a little bit too high for a small market."
"One of the biggest areas for improvement is that every time an existing data element is modified, it creates a new data element. It doesn't really modify that particular data element. So, a user has to follow an extra step of removing the existing data element and bringing in the new and modified data element that is being added, which sort of goes into negative productivity."
"Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
AgilePoint is ranked 23rd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 5 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 2nd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, Nintex Process Platform, Camunda and ServiceNow Now Platform, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Xamarin Platform. See our AgilePoint vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.