We performed a comparison between Allot IoTSecure and Forescout Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security."The most valuable feature of Allot IoTSecure is bandwidth optimization."
"Forescout Platform's best feature is plug-in integration."
"The threat prevention feature provides complete visibility."
"Forescout has a feature that blocks the endpoint at the point of collection. It sets preconditions and will block the system if those aren't met."
"The most valuable feature of the Forescout Platform is the large capacity it can handle. Additionally, the interface of the platform is good."
"Forescout CounterACT has allowed us to better open our access and control wireless access globally from our HQ. This allows us to monitor the network access for every office globally. This has improved overall security, reducing risk and opening up the opportunity to provide greater end user flexibility."
"Forescout Platform has made it possible to block people working near our construction sites who should not have access to our network."
"The standout strength of this solution lies in its unique capability to effectively manage unmanaged switches."
"The most valuable features are remote access and administration scripts."
"Allot IoTSecure could improve by providing better documentation, there was not any documentation on their website."
"As a user, if I am using a laptop that is Wi-Fi connected, Forescout identifies my port connectivity as one user license, and if I take that same laptop with the same username to a wired network, which is also the same network that is used for the Wi-Fi connection, Forescout detects it as a separate license."
"Can be expensive if it's only being used for one feature."
"We experienced some detection issues when checking compliance for the Sophos agent."
"The solution's customer support is bad and should be improved."
"The system controls could be better."
"In the next release of the solution, it could benefit from being more flexible to allow for more freedom."
"Forescout Platform isn't flexible with connections to devices like printers and forces you to re-enter details like the MAC address after any breakdowns."
"Two things can be improved in the Forescout Platform. First of all, the support for some certain proprietary protocols from other vendors, but they are very widely used. If the TechEx from Cisco, was added to Forescout, then it will be a full solution for me."
Allot IoTSecure is ranked 9th in IoT Security with 1 review while Forescout Platform is ranked 1st in IoT Security with 69 reviews. Allot IoTSecure is rated 6.0, while Forescout Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Allot IoTSecure writes "Useful bandwidth optimization, reliable, but difficult to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". Allot IoTSecure is most compared with , whereas Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Armis.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.
We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.