Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Bigtable comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
3,905 views|3,377 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Google Logo
1,886 views|1,115 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Bigtable based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Never used the support. I got all the information from the documentation.""Speed is the most valuable feature. The speed to store and retrieve data from it.""It is a NoSQL product.""Amazon DynamoDB is powerful and fast. Its performance is good.""Amazon DynamoDB allows you to configure your read-write capacity and create a single global table that can be accessed with any other region.""We don't have to administer the tool.""The solution is very simple to use.""The platform is easy to develop and configure."

More Amazon DynamoDB Pros →

"Stability-wise, it is a simple solution. I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.""Bigtable is faster than other competitors in the market. It helps us collate all the data, and the security features are great. The latency is low, and the computation speed is fantastic. Bigtable is also a managed service, so you don't have to worry about anything aside from analyzing the data ingested.""The solution is very convenient.""It's very user-friendly where streaming data is required.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The most valuable feature is the backup and replication service."

More Google Cloud Bigtable Pros →

Cons
"It would be nice to have some AI features in DynamoDB.""If the database is kept running continuously, extra costs will be incurred. This particular area needs enhancement.""Amazon DynamoDB could improve by being more robust, having a better user interface and data management. Additionally, there is some limited functionality compared to other solutions, such as MongoDB.""If you have no prior experience with this type of non-relational database, the syntaxes, implementation, or understanding may be difficult.""The design patterns and the documentation for this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to see an improvement of the data push options as we sometimes experience blockers when moving data.""Currently, there is no option for a scheduled refresh in this solution. We want the data to be populated into DynamoDB on a timely basis. Currently, you have to go to the DynamoDB table and hit the refresh button to populate it with the new data. If you have connected DynamoDB to a BI application for creating visualizations with charts, graphs, or other things, you would want it to get updated as per the schedule so that you have updated visualizations in your BI application.""I'd like to see better integration with Cognito. It has the integration, but I'd like to see a little more ease of setup. If you have multiple customers and you want the database to enforce who can see what, you can treat DynamoDB so that each row has permissions. You can set this up, but it's a little more of a science project to make Cognito and DynamoDB work well to do protection of individual rows. So I'd like that to be more wizard or easy to set up.""Sometimes when we query through the UI, it takes a long time to get the results."

More Amazon DynamoDB Cons →

"When it comes to complex queries, a user can't get any help from a drop-down box and pick columns. It would be great if some improvements could be made in the aforementioned area concerning the solution.""This product needs better security and transparency, and the price should be reduced.""The cost of this product is too expensive.""I've used Bigtable for about three or four years.""Improvement should be made as per customer recommended and requirements.""The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Google Cloud Bigtable Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its subscription cost is lower than similar databases offered by other vendors."
  • "You can get committed capacity or transaction-based pricing. If you're doing it on demand, they charge based on whether you're reading or writing. They charge $1.25 for every million rights to the database and 25 cents for every million reads from the database. The first 25 gigabytes of storage are free, and they charge 25 cents a gigabyte a month. So, it's a very different world. It's a quarter a gigabyte a month. You can store a lot of data. They have a separate fee for automated backup, and if you want it globally distributed, where it's distributed around the world, there's a slightly different price."
  • "I would rate the pricing for this solution a four out of five."
  • "It is a little expensive."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the pricing a seven. It is not the cheapest, but it is not the costliest either."
  • "Amazon DynamoDB is cheap."
  • "Compared to a high-end relational database, it's cheap."
  • "For our use case usage, DynamoDB's pricing was okay. However, for high-traffic applications, the pricing structure becomes less attractive."
  • More Amazon DynamoDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We don't have to administer the tool.
    Top Answer:We use the document database. The primary key is quite slow. The free tier is quite hard to use.
    Top Answer:We use the solution to emulate MongoDB for the document database.
    Top Answer:Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the performance of the product needs improvement.
    Top Answer:When a client gives our organization a project where they need a dashboard for their company, they provide us with some data from their database, which is usually presented in Google Cloud Bigtable… more »
    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    3,905
    Comparisons
    3,377
    Reviews
    21
    Average Words per Review
    510
    Rating
    8.5
    3rd
    Views
    1,886
    Comparisons
    1,115
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    365
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. You can use Amazon DynamoDB to create a database table that can store and retrieve any amount of data, and serve any level of request traffic. Amazon DynamoDB automatically spreads the data and traffic for the table over a sufficient number of servers to handle the request capacity specified by the customer and the amount of data stored, while maintaining consistent and fast performance.

    Cloud Bigtable is Google's NoSQL Big Data database service. It's the same database that powers many core Google services, including Search, Analytics, Maps, and Gmail.

    Sample Customers
    Samsung, Snapchat, Capital One, Expedia, Tinder, Airbnb, Comcast, Lyft, Redfin, Netflix, Adobe
    Cognite, Dow Jones, Loblaw Digital
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider27%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Healthcare Company9%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    University14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon DynamoDB is ranked 2nd in Managed NoSQL Databases with 29 reviews while Google Cloud Bigtable is ranked 3rd in Managed NoSQL Databases with 6 reviews. Amazon DynamoDB is rated 8.4, while Google Cloud Bigtable is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon DynamoDB writes "Manages our contact center dynamically and allows us to store multiple data attributes in tables". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Bigtable writes "A stable product to help resolve production-related issues". Amazon DynamoDB is most compared with Amazon DocumentDB, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, Amazon Neptune, Amazon Timestream and Amazon Keyspaces, whereas Google Cloud Bigtable is most compared with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and Amazon Timestream. See our Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable report.

    See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.