We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The product enables the users to query results faster."
"I found that MongoDB is most valuable for storing school-related queries. It's also user-friendly, and I found no difficulty accessing it. Setting it up is easy too."
"It is very fast - faster than an SQL or MySQL Server."
"MongoDB is extremely developer-friendly because when you are starting, there is very little time needed upfront in terms of planning."
"I like that MongoDB has a free version. You can also buy the enterprise edition, which is cheaper than Oracle."
"It's super easy to develop a couple of solutions for clients with MongoDB, like a quick web page with no clear data structure that they need to spin up quickly to validate some sort of MDTP."
"It is convenient to use because we can do manipulations with the JSON data that we get. There are also a lot of joins and associations with MongoDB, which makes it easy to use for us."
"The most valuable features of MongoDB are the variety of translations available and the ability to deploy it on the cloud is useful. The cloud users can access the data, work on the data, and if they want to import or manipulate some data they can."
"The installation is very stable."
"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."
"I would like to see the scalability and security improved."
"The on-premises version of the solution is still pretty expensive, especially compared to the cloud version."
"Enhancing the documentation to make it more beginner-friendly is crucial."
"I feel that most people don't know a lot about MongoDB, so maybe they could add some more documentation and tutorials."
"Lacks sufficient scalability and elasticity."
"The improvements could be made to intelligence to detect disk storage and prevent MongoDB from crashing."
"MongoDB could be more secure."
"It isn't easy to recognize entities with MongoDB."
Amazon QLDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews. Amazon QLDB is rated 8.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon QLDB writes "A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". Amazon QLDB is most compared with , whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Qdrant.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.