Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
9,253 views|7,505 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
11,173 views|5,178 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 14, 2022

We performed a comparison between Amazon RDS and SQL Azure based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions relate that setup and deployment are easy and straightforward.
  • Features: Amazon RDS users like that the solution is easy to use and very stable, flexible, and robust. Users are able to select as many tools, replicas, regions, and zones as desired. Users tell us the Performance Monitor can be a bit clunky and an improved GUI would be welcomed. They would like better integration with Microsoft products and feel that many of the security features could be improved.

    SQL Azure users like that the product integrates seamlessly with SQL Server on-premises, in addition to the darknet stack and table groups. The solution offers a very intuitive interface and easy to manage firewall settings. There are many functions available on-premises that are not currently available with Azure cloud.
  • Pricing: Users of both of these products feel that pricing is very high and that overall costs could be lower.
  • Service and Support: Users of both solutions are very satisfied with the service and support they have received.

Comparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, SQL Azure nudges slightly ahead of Amazon RDS. SQL Azure is part of the Microsoft Azure ecosystem and offers huge benefits to Microsoft / Microsoft Azure, users which represents tremendous cost savings, great security, and seamless integrations with most Microsoft products.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. SQL Azure Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is scalable and can be configured with AWS Secrets Manager.""Encryption is the most valuable feature.""Relational databases excel in extensive normalization, eliminating data redundancy and efficiently structuring tables which leads to a clear and efficient relationship between tables using primary keys.""The IT is easy to set up, which is the best.""Amazon RDS is good for backups, auto-scanning, and disaster recovery. It's also appropriate for the office server.""Amazon RDS is easy to maintain and easy to deploy.""The solution's customer service is excellent.""The product's installation phase is easy."

More Amazon RDS Pros →

"Azure Portal is most valuable.""The SQL connector effectively syncs data to our database.""It's the type of product that doesn't need much technical support assistance as it works seamlessly.""SQL is a simpler database. We use it more than other databases.""Database services and Active Directory related functions for this solution are good. Stable, scalable, and easy to install. Its technical support is good.""The product is quite stable. The performance is great and it's reliable.""My impression is that this solution is quite stable.""The solution is quite straightforward to set up."

More SQL Azure Pros →

Cons
"Amazon RDS could improve by having more sophisticated. I use other solutions that have better technology for more difficult tasks.""The solution is a bit expensive.""Technical support could be better.""It would be helpful if they made it easier to migrate from an existing on-premises solution to the cloud-based service.""The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.""There are a few aspects of database management that have room for improvement. There are a few parameters in the solution that are a bit unclear at our end as it's not understandable.""The solution could improve by adding a sandbox environment and more security.""Sometimes the interface has many moving parts, which is a concern."

More Amazon RDS Cons →

"Some issues with scalability.""From a security perspective, although their features are decent, they can always be improved upon, updated, and refined to help protect clients better.""One of the nice features in Microsoft SQL Server is the SQL Server CLR, which we sometimes need to use to protect our procedures using C# or CLR. This is not available in the SQL Azure database.""I'm not really a SQL DBA, so I can't go into the depths of the areas that need to be improved. They can maybe make it a bit easier to educate people on how to develop SQL Server in Azure. They can provide some free seminars and webinars and more training in general for easier migration. I know there is some stuff on Microsoft learning, but it would be helpful and useful to have more up-to-date content.""The solution could improve by supporting more operating systems.""The way it has been designed, in the on-premises deployments, the underlying Windows OS is highly scalable but has a very large resource requirement. A lot of power-related and memory-related things are there, which I have not seen in the RHEL and Oracle. I have not tried SQL on RHEL EXEC. On Windows, infrastructure-wise, a very large workload is running on the SQL. This issue is related to Windows, not SQL.""The solution can be improved by reducing the cost so more users can be added.""The solution lacks feedback tools."

More SQL Azure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."
  • "The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."
  • "The price could be better."
  • "It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."
  • "We are paying for a service license."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."
  • "if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."
  • "Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."
  • More Amazon RDS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have a three-year contract. The cost was somewhere around $70-80,000 for the original deployment, which was about two years ago"
  • "I'm not sure what the exact price is, but it's a moderate amount. It's not too expensive."
  • "The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
  • "We pay less than $1000 monthly in licensing fees. There are no additional costs."
  • "It is expensive for us. We are looking for something less expensive and thinking of migrating the whole system."
  • "It is reasonable."
  • "It is quite expensive. I would definitely recommend not using the pay-as-you-go model because this will just mean all your money will go to Microsoft. So, really make sure to control resource usage as much as possible."
  • "It's reasonably priced and when you compare it with other products in the cloud environment, it's cheaper."
  • More SQL Azure Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's installation phase is easy.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. If Cisco needs two servers, Amazon uses four.
    Top Answer:The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
    Top Answer:I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    9,253
    Comparisons
    7,505
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.4
    2nd
    Views
    11,173
    Comparisons
    5,178
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RDS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

    Microsoft Azure SQL Database is a relational database-as-a-service that delivers predictable performance, scalability, business continuity, data protection, and near-zero administration to cloud developers and solution architects. This is the deep technical library for Azure SQL Database.
    Sample Customers
    Edmodo
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization61%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise65%
    Large Enterprise24%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon RDS vs. SQL Azure
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. SQL Azure and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon RDS is ranked 1st in Database as a Service with 45 reviews while SQL Azure is ranked 2nd in Database as a Service with 90 reviews. Amazon RDS is rated 8.4, while SQL Azure is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon RDS writes "Provides excellent authentication, authorization, integration, data protection, and autoscaling features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Azure writes "The SQL connector effectively syncs data to databases". Amazon RDS is most compared with MongoDB Atlas, Google Cloud SQL, Oracle Database as a Service, Google Cloud Spanner and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, whereas SQL Azure is most compared with Google Cloud SQL, MongoDB Atlas, Oracle Database as a Service, Google Cloud Spanner and IBM Db2 on Cloud. See our Amazon RDS vs. SQL Azure report.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.