We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is simple to use and not very expensive."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is scalable, flexible, easy to maintain and handle."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is an easy-to-use solution."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally."
"Amazon S3 Glacier can integrate seamlessly with other AWS services."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."
"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."
"The product needs to improve cloud security."
"They should increase the data limit for the free version or reduce the price."
"Amazon S3 Glacier could be more secure."
"Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved."
"The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved."
"The learning curve is very high."
"Technical support needs improvement. Previously, even though we had premium and enterprise support, the response time would be quicker if we ran into issues, but now it is slowed down. The analytical dashboard feature, like the CloudOps dashboard, should be included in the next release of the Amazon S3 Glacier."
"The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved."
"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."
Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service and Google Cloud Storage. See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
