Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
8,712 views|5,262 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
1,007 views|860 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Microsoft Azure Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product is easy to use.""I don't have any problems with the solution. It's issue-free.""Some of the most valuable features are how convenient and easy to use S3 is. It's nicely integrated with AWS and is available on the AWS console.""Easy to use, very intuitive, fast, and quite flexible.""The solution's peak-up time is good.""The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are the performance and hibernation data options. Additionally, there is a feature that provides faster website access that is helpful.""Uploads are secure and occur instantly.""The users have nothing to worry about as the solution is well established."

More Amazon S3 Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Azure Object Storage for us is its simplicity and reliability as a storage solution.""Technical support has been excellent.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides a platform for uploading or downloading big datasets.""The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers hassle-free usage. It is easy to configure.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage is an easy-to-use and stable solution.""This product is very reliable and all of the security that our client requires is available.""Technical support is excellent."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pros →

Cons
"Maybe they need to expand their range of physical locations.""The stability of the solution has room for improvement.""Amazon S3 could improve the load balancers. They are very basic compared to other solutions in the industry, such as F5. It has to be able to be analyzed up to a certain level.""A feature that should be included is to find and provide a HIPPA compliant solution for the Presigned URL.""Maybe it could be a bit cheaper.""We have cold storage here, and I think that's useful. When it comes to commercialization, it's cheaper to put data that you won't be using into the data storage. You only use a little bit of the data needed each day for your transition, so you pay less.""The only pain point is migrating the life cycle policy because if someone is a newbie, they cannot easily create the life cycle policy.""Technical support could have a faster response time."

More Amazon S3 Cons →

"Its user interface could be better.""They could provide multiple tools to provide you with cost calculations, giving you a better picture or providing better details of the cost calculations over the years.""The solution's stability should be improved.""Technical support should be faster at resolving issues for tickets that we create.""We experienced an outage issue recently, which affected its overall stability and reliability.""If we look at the different versions of that ADLS, it really does not have a hierarchical storage mechanism.""We have experienced a data copy bottleneck with the AZ copy using Microsoft Azure Object Storage, this should improve. It has high CPU consumption. There are a couple of ways to copy files fast, we have tried a few ways. Other than AZ copy, we can use Azure Fluent Storage, which also takes a lot of time to copy files. The AZ copy is faster but it takes a lot of time and CPU operations.""We're still testing the solution. It's too early to make any suggestions as to what may be missing."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "With S3 Standard, there is not a charge for deletion of objects."
  • "This solution has reasonable pricing and a low cost."
  • "The licensing is pay as you go, and I'm happy with the pricing."
  • "The cost of storage is cheap. However, the cost to have a better interface can get expensive. We are using Athena for this purpose and if we did some heavy queries the cost will start adding up. When the Athena query is running, it will scan the bucket and they charge for how many GBs we are going to scan. The function of scanning has a lot of costs attached to it, this is a negative point."
  • "The price of the Amazon S3 is low. The license model is based on what you use."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 depends on various variables. However, the price overall is fair."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 could be less expensive."
  • "The license of Amazon S3 is based on volume, capacity, and time. The overall price of the solution could improve. The support has to be added if you want it at an additional cost."
  • More Amazon S3 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year."
  • "For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there."
  • "The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "The cost should be reduced to make it more competitive."
  • "Pricing is always confusing for all Microsoft products. For this solution, they do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed."
  • "We have a separate package and pay extra for additional technical support."
  • "The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is monthly. We have two types of licenses. One is the EA enterprise license and the other is a CSP license."
  • "It has a pay-as-you-go model. So, you are only paying for what you store. It's an attractive model. You don't pay for a set; you pay for what you actually use."
  • More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon S3 is very flexible and provides high storage.
    Top Answer:The solution is cost-effective because it is based on a pay-as-you-go model, where I can purchase and use it according to my needs.
    Top Answer:No direct connector is available to connect Amazon S3 with other tools like MicroStrategy. So, I have to use a third party and connect to it.
    Top Answer:The tool has a pay-per-use pricing model. You need to pay for what you are consuming. It is not a complex model. It is not an expensive product. There is no need to pay extra money for the licensing… more »
    Top Answer:The product hangs sometimes. The password retrieval process was very difficult.
    Ranking
    Views
    8,712
    Comparisons
    5,262
    Reviews
    49
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.8
    Views
    1,007
    Comparisons
    860
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    375
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    S3, Simple Storage Service
    Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

    Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.

    REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

    • Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
    • Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
    • Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
    • Power big data analytics
    • Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest
    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
    Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Real Estate/Law Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization68%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Media Company10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Retailer11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise72%
    Large Enterprise20%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 70 reviews while Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 9th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 45 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Can be used to safely store big datasets in the cloud at a reasonable price". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage and Wasabi. See our Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.