We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the automated replication of the data."
"Technical support is excellent."
"Enables content sharing by multiple users."
"We've had no issues with stability."
"It's very well secured. We have S3 policies that allow you to write custom policies."
"We find the archival capabilities of this solution quite valuable, because we can have set policies of exactly when, and what to archive."
"The most valuable feature of the product is storage classes."
"Great for storing all types of data."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"Amazon S3 could improve by being more secure."
"The security model can be improved as it is a bit confusing."
"A feature that should be included is to find and provide a HIPPA compliant solution for the Presigned URL."
"We would like Amazon to reduce the price of storage."
"The console could be improved - it's not very user friendly for non-technical guys."
"We would like to see improvement in the ability to moves files within this solution. At present the process is not straightforward, and requires us to download files to our micro service service before then uploading into the solution. In addition, the transfer bit rate for the process is very slow."
"The major challenge is the inability to create more than ten policies."
"No direct connector is available to connect Amazon S3 with other tools like MicroStrategy."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The scalability could improve."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 70 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Zadara, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Amazon S3 vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
