Apache NiFi vs Apache Spark comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
3,672 views|1,791 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Apache Logo
2,893 views|2,256 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache NiFi and Apache Spark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Compute Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache NiFi vs. Apache Spark Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The user interface is good and makes it easy to design very popular workflows.""We can integrate the tool with other applications easily.""The most valuable feature has been the range of clients and the range of connectors that we could use.""Visually, this is a good product.""The most valuable features of this solution are ease of use and implementation.""It's an automated flow, where you can build a flow from source to destination, then do the transformation in between.""The initial setup is very easy. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one point is difficult, and ten points are easy.""The initial setup is very easy."

More Apache NiFi Pros →

"The product's deployment phase is easy.""The most valuable feature of this solution is its capacity for processing large amounts of data.""It's easy to prepare parallelism in Spark, run the solution with specific parameters, and get good performance.""The processing time is very much improved over the data warehouse solution that we were using.""The solution has been very stable.""The main feature that we find valuable is that it is very fast.""The product’s most valuable feature is the SQL tool. It enables us to create a database and publish it.""Apache Spark can do large volume interactive data analysis."

More Apache Spark Pros →

Cons
"There are some claims that NiFi is cloud-native but we have tested it, and it's not.""There should be a better way to integrate a development environment with local tools.""I think the UI interface needs to be more user-friendly.""We run many jobs, and there are already large tables. When we do not control NiFi on time, all reports fail for the day. So it's pretty slow to control, and it has to be improved.""More features must be added to the product.""The use case templates could be more precise to typical business needs.""There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible.""The overall stability of this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have access to more features that could be used in a parallel way. This would provide more freedom with processing."

More Apache NiFi Cons →

"In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, do the transformation in a subsecond, and all that.""This solution currently cannot support or distribute neural network related models, or deep learning related algorithms. We would like this functionality to be developed.""It would be beneficial to enhance Spark's capabilities by incorporating models that utilize features not traditionally present in its framework.""The initial setup was not easy.""If you have a Spark session in the background, sometimes it's very hard to kill these sessions because of D allocation.""The solution must improve its performance.""We've had problems using a Python process to try to access something in a large volume of data. It crashes if somebody gives me the wrong code because it cannot handle a large volume of data.""Apache Spark can improve the use case scenarios from the website. There is not any information on how you can use the solution across the relational databases toward multiple databases."

More Apache Spark Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "We use the free version of Apache NiFi."
  • "The solution is open-source."
  • More Apache NiFi Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I am using it open source, so it means it's free for me to use.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization… more »
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    3,672
    Comparisons
    1,791
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    565
    Rating
    7.4
    5th
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    2,893
    Comparisons
    2,256
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Spring Boot logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    AWS Batch logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Spark SQL logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    SAP HANA logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Amazon EMR logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview
    Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    Sample Customers
    Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache NiFi vs. Apache Spark
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache NiFi vs. Apache Spark and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache NiFi is ranked 8th in Compute Service with 10 reviews while Apache Spark is ranked 5th in Compute Service with 60 reviews. Apache NiFi is rated 7.8, while Apache Spark is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache NiFi writes "Allows the creation and use of custom functions to achieve desired functionality but limitation in handling monthly transactions due to a lack of partitioning for dates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". Apache NiFi is most compared with Google Cloud Dataflow, AWS Lambda, Azure Stream Analytics, Apache Storm and AWS Fargate, whereas Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Amazon EMR. See our Apache NiFi vs. Apache Spark report.

    See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

    We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.