Apache Spark vs IBM Spectrum Computing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,346 views|1,845 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
204 views|181 comparisons
40% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and IBM Spectrum Computing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"DataFrame: Spark SQL gives the leverage to create applications more easily and with less coding effort.""Spark can handle small to huge data and is suitable for any size of company.""I appreciate everything about the solution, not just one or two specific features. The solution is highly stable. I rate it a perfect ten. The solution is highly scalable. I rate it a perfect ten. The initial setup was straightforward. I recommend using the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a perfect ten.""The product’s most valuable feature is the SQL tool. It enables us to create a database and publish it.""AI libraries are the most valuable. They provide extensibility and usability. Spark has a lot of connectors, which is a very important and useful feature for AI. You need to connect a lot of points for AI, and you have to get data from those systems. Connectors are very wide in Spark. With a Spark cluster, you can get fast results, especially for AI.""With Spark, we parallelize our operations, efficiently accessing both historical and real-time data.""The deployment of the product is easy.""The most valuable feature is the Fault Tolerance and easy binding with other processes like Machine Learning, graph analytics."

More Apache Spark Pros →

"This solution is working for both VTL and tape.""The most valuable feature is the backup capability.""Spectrum Computing's best features are its speed, robustness, and data processing and analysis.""The most valuable aspect of the product is the policy driving resource management, to optimize the computing across data centers.""We are satisfied with the technical support, we have no issues.""Easy to operate and use."

More IBM Spectrum Computing Pros →

Cons
"In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, do the transformation in a subsecond, and all that.""When you are working with large, complex tasks, the garbage collection process is slow and affects performance.""The solution’s integration with other platforms should be improved.""When you want to extract data from your HDFS and other sources then it is kind of tricky because you have to connect with those sources.""Its UI can be better. Maintaining the history server is a little cumbersome, and it should be improved. I had issues while looking at the historical tags, which sometimes created problems. You have to separately create a history server and run it. Such things can be made easier. Instead of separately installing the history server, it can be made a part of the whole setup so that whenever you set it up, it becomes available.""I know there is always discussion about which language to write applications in and some people do love Scala. However, I don't like it.""We use big data manager but we cannot use it as conditional data so whenever we're trying to fetch the data, it takes a bit of time.""It needs a new interface and a better way to get some data. In terms of writing our scripts, some processes could be faster."

More Apache Spark Cons →

"Lack of sufficient documentation, particularly in Spanish.""Spectrum Computing is lagging behind other products, most likely because it hasn't been shifted to the cloud.""SMB storage and HPC is not compatible and it should be supported by IBM Spectrum Computing.""We'd like to see some AI model training for machine learning.""We have not been able to use deduplication.""This solution is no longer managing tapes correctly."

More IBM Spectrum Computing Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution is expensive."
  • "Spectrum Computing is one of the most expensive products on the market."
  • More IBM Spectrum Computing Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Top Answer:This solution is too expensive for a lot of our customers.
    Top Answer:The biggest problem is the lack of documentation in general, and documentation in Spanish, in particular.
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    2,346
    Comparisons
    1,845
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    8.7
    7th
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    204
    Comparisons
    181
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    240
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Platform Computing
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    IBM Spectrum Computing uses intelligent workload and policy-driven resource management to optimize resources across the data center, on premises and in the cloud. Now up to 150X faster and scalable to over 160,000 cores, IBM provides you with the latest advances in software-defined infrastructure to help you unleash the power of your distributed mission-critical high performance computing (HPC), analytics and big data applications as well as a new generation open source frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark.

    Sample Customers
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    London South Bank University, Transvalor, Infiniti Red Bull Racing, Genomic
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider31%
    Media Company16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Spark is ranked 1st in Hadoop with 60 reviews while IBM Spectrum Computing is ranked 7th in Hadoop with 6 reviews. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while IBM Spectrum Computing is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Computing writes "Provides stable backup for our databases and has good technical support ". Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas IBM Spectrum Computing is most compared with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric. See our Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing report.

    See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

    We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.