We performed a comparison between Apache Web Server and Oracle SOA Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."
"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."
"It is more secure to use Apache and you will have fewer problems than other web services."
"The control panel is very easy to navigate. It's similar to most hosting platforms, so it's user-friendly. Once you get used to it, managing your hosting becomes easy, too."
"It is scalable."
"The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly."
"Apache Web Server can be used as a proxy server"
"The best thing about Apache is that it is open-source, so implementing my platform on-premises is less expansive than other solutions."
"Valuable features include web service development and cloud connectivity."
"We were able to scale out using multiple application and web servers balanced by hardware load balancers and Weblogic clustering."
"I found the adapters to be most useful."
"The new product has come out with SOA Cloud Service and Integration Analytics as well, which gives more options for clients to pick their point of requirements."
"Provides connectivity between discrete systems and has availability."
"Valuable features include connectors and BAM."
"The product provides transparency in finances."
"Enables our Product Manager to post products to different outside EC platforms with only one interface and one process."
"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."
"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."
"The interface has room for improvement."
"Adding a reverse proxy to Apache Web Server would be a significant improvement."
"The product's initial setup process could be easier for users."
"In future releases, I would like to see better server optimization."
"There isn't a dedicated customer support available"
"Lacks integration with some cloud solutions."
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved."
"Its function options can be improved."
"Decrease the number of internal resources which the product uses."
"An important area that can be improved is the product's data monitoring. When we use the solution for interfacing or end-to-end data monitoring, we want to know exactly where the data is going and exactly where it is failing, or where there is an issue."
"It's also not developer-friendly."
"SOA, OSB, SOA Cloud Service."
"SOA"
"The product is not user-friendly."
Apache Web Server is ranked 3rd in Application Infrastructure with 22 reviews while Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews. Apache Web Server is rated 8.6, while Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache Web Server writes "Has good security, speed and traffic handling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". Apache Web Server is most compared with IIS, NGINX Plus, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework and WebLogic Suite, whereas Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, WebLogic Suite, TIBCO ActiveMatrix, Microsoft .NET Framework and IBM BPM. See our Apache Web Server vs. Oracle SOA Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.