We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Avantra based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We're a large organization, so we appreciate AppDynamics' wide coverage. It may not work in all areas, but it has broad coverage. We can use the same dataset for different use case aspects. That is the beauty of AppDynamics. You can coordinate APM, EUM, and infrastructure through one dataset."
"We are able to correlate performance between tiers."
"Provides monitoring more around business processes versus just servers, applications, etc. E.g., with complex systems, where a business process passes across multiple applications, the business needs us to monitor the heath of the process, not just a segment of the application."
"Has helped us to increase customer acquisitions and reduce revenue leakage."
"It allows us to configure health rules so that we can, based on our own experience, determine when an application is behaving incorrectly."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is its ability to track the transactions between different applications."
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is Proactive Monitoring and Alerting."
"You can customize alerts based on need."
"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."
"It's very easy to manage and use."
"AppDynamics could benefit from greater integration with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning."
"The initial setup could be easier."
"As per my experience, the drill-down feature can be improved at the class level."
"The documentation and training material have room for improvement."
"I would like to see more artificial intelligence and machine learning brought in to monitor the statement and payment sum issues we have."
"This solution is expensive."
"It would help to maybe have a more graphical interface and more user-friendly graphics."
"Regarding Search Guard functionality, there is room for improvement."
"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 154 reviews while Avantra is ranked 39th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 5 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Avantra is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Avantra writes "User-friendly, simple to set up and easy to configure". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Avantra is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace and OpsRamp. See our AppDynamics vs. Avantra report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.