"I love that Aras has a utility or tool that you can use online to extend Aras."
"The most valuable features are the ease of workflow configuration and customisation development."
"We did some research and chose CloudSuite because it has the flexibility to cover a range of areas. And there were many other factors like traceability, for example, which is crucial for food production."
"Some valuable features include improved transparency in sales processes, which has been vital for our operations."
"Infor CloudSuite Industrial is easy to setup. The built-in solution is already there, so we can start implementing it right away when we install it in an organization. After going through different test executions and workshops, any missing features can be added using Infor extension tables and other products. It will take at least eight to nine months to go live."
"The customization capabilities of CloudSuite Industrial are also there."
"Workflow management and collaboration tools enhance operations and facilitate seamless interaction among departments."
"Infor's environment—ION and Infor OS—is better than SAP's. The load time is shorter and Infor performs much better than SAP."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is particularly effective for ERP. The automation of emails is a valuable feature for me. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. Infor CloudSuite Industrial is better for its development aspect. It allows us to customize and implement changes more efficiently. The initial setup was straightforward. I recommend the solution."
"Aras would also benefit from better integration with other systems."
"Better Manufacturing BOM management would be valuable."
"It takes time to properly learn what the product can do."
"Currently, there are some challenges with handling large reports, possibly due to setup limits or issues with the solution."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. For us, it's the pricing aspect. Since we're South African, it's difficult when it's a dollar-based product."
"Planning needs to be improved. That is, industry-specific planning details need to be added and refined."
"Pricing is always an area where there is room for improvement."
"The platform's distribution features need enhancement."
"There should be better clarity and agreement on all interfaces and requirements before signing a contract. This would avoid unexpected costs and complications later on."
"Infor needs to work on its documentation. For example, if I need to create a business object deployment from LVN to element, the instructions for this are insufficient. Many specific use cases aren't covered in the manual."
Aras Innovator is ranked 4th in PLM Tools with 2 reviews while Infor CloudSuite is ranked 14th in ERP with 13 reviews. Aras Innovator is rated 8.0, while Infor CloudSuite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aras Innovator writes "Strong ability to customize, but require improvements to their BOM configuration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infor CloudSuite writes " Advanced forecasting and analysis capabilities". Aras Innovator is most compared with Siemens PLM TeamCenter, PTC Windchill and Arena PLM, whereas Infor CloudSuite is most compared with Infor LN, Infor M3, SAP Warehouse Management, IBM Maximo and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.
We monitor all PLM Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
